Justice Watch Discussion Board [ JonBenét Ramsey Discussion ] [ Missing & Exploited Children and True Crimes ] [ Front Porch ] [ Work Out Room ] "Private Room?" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... Private Room?, Shamrockpati, 18:20:01, 3/06/2000 Hi Pati, Chart, 22:02:25, 3/07/2000, (#1) I want to scream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1, kdubois2, 14:26:43, 3/11/2000, (#2) LOL, Lacey, 19:08:38, 3/11/2000, (#3) Lacey....., Pedro, 05:49:36, 3/16/2000, (#4) I Agree Pedro ..., mandarin, 16:23:07, 3/18/2000, (#5) Sorry Pedro ..., mandarin, 16:26:10, 3/18/2000, (#6) Mandarin...., Pedro, 07:06:50, 3/19/2000, (#7) Pedro ...., mandarin, 21:19:37, 3/21/2000, (#8) MSE, Lacey, 05:48:14, 3/22/2000, (#9) Mandarin and Lacey...., Pedro, 08:06:18, 3/22/2000, (#10) Pedro, Etc ....., mandarin, 12:52:48, 3/22/2000, (#11) I know...., Ginja, 19:18:50, 5/26/2000, (#12) Some thoughts, sarah, 17:24:01, 5/28/2000, (#14) Sarah..., 7kluz, 23:39:11, 5/28/2000, (#16) 7 Kluz, sarah, 11:05:03, 5/29/2000, (#17) Sarah..., 7kluz, 14:54:09, 5/30/2000, (#21) Yo Ginj, Lacey, 13:39:40, 5/27/2000, (#13) Sarah, China, 21:15:20, 5/28/2000, (#15) thank you, sarah, 11:12:16, 5/29/2000, (#18) Hey!, Gemini, 15:53:52, 5/29/2000, (#19) The Rules (lol), Lacey, 19:01:04, 5/29/2000, (#20) What the hell, Watching you, 05:15:09, 5/31/2000, (#22) Who the hell is, Watching you, 05:29:06, 5/31/2000, (#23) Mandarin, Watching you, 05:34:06, 5/31/2000, (#24) Huh?, Chris, 06:48:03, 5/31/2000, (#25) Not sure what, Watching you, 06:51:47, 5/31/2000, (#26) ., China, 09:18:08, 5/31/2000, (#27) And I love you, China, Watching you, 09:39:22, 5/31/2000, (#28) Where's Sparky?, Watching you, 09:47:31, 5/31/2000, (#29) I am curious...., gail, 16:18:58, 5/31/2000, (#30) Well Gail, Chris, 19:20:10, 5/31/2000, (#31) Well I'm far from straight...., China, 07:55:44, 6/01/2000, (#32) Gail, 1000Sparks, 08:03:45, 6/01/2000, (#33) Thankyou1000sparks, gail, 14:24:21, 6/01/2000, (#34) Gail, Orsen, 21:13:06, 6/02/2000, (#37) Gail!, Sailer, 09:39:56, 6/02/2000, (#35) WOR.., Pedro, 12:26:20, 6/02/2000, (#36) hi Orsen, gail, 04:54:37, 6/03/2000, (#38) Hi Everyone ..., mandarin, 22:56:04, 6/24/2000, (#39) ...hahaha, jonesy, 15:08:27, 6/25/2000, (#40) pacts?, Watching you, 04:49:15, 6/26/2000, (#41) ................................................................... "Private Room?" Posted by Shamrockpati on 18:20:01 3/06/2000 Chris is this the "private room" that hir was discussing in the littlehead forum? just wanted to know LOL....hir has been active lately...hasn't hir....LOL Bite me...... LOL [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "Hi Pati" Posted by Chart on 22:02:25 3/07/2000 Maybe this is the only private spot left. I needed my password to get in. Chris - Thanks for all the hard work you've done in getting our new forum up and running. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "I want to scream!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1" Posted by kdubois2 on 14:26:43 3/11/2000 I had to come here, because i can't take that DW anymore. This person drives me insane! I just can't stand a know it all. And by the way this person doesn't know it all. Why did this person show up now? Just to get under everybodys skin. There is something very fishy about this person.I wish WY was around, she seems to handle her pretty good without flying off the handle. PS. I'am talking about the fruit person. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "LOL" Posted by Lacey on 04:57:15 3/12/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 04:57:15, 3/12/2000 I just now found this forum, surfing around. I can't take it over @ JBR anymore ... what on earth ever happened to JfJBR? That forum has been overrun by trolls and I don't have the kahonas to komplain anymore. LOL look who's talking!!!!! Lacey [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "Lacey....." Posted by Pedro on 05:49:36 3/16/2000 ....you were always the best, with China and Abra, :-). Take it easie all you, the trolls are just trolls....heh Pedro [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "I Agree Pedro ..." Posted by mandarin on 16:23:07 3/18/2000 Really was the best (or should I say still is the best). Of course, I had a few others I really liked to. It's really too bad though, that things get out of hand at JW, but I think it is heavily infected from time to time with zingers and red herrings thrown in to divert from meaningful discussion. I especially feel uncomfortable with everyone suddenly turning on Fleet and Priscilla White and giving a perfect stranger MW (?) full credibility. Believe me, it changed my mind about a lot of posters that I once thought were very credible. Lacey though, still remains the undisputed voice of reason on JW. So please Lacey, don't stop posting there - at least stay active till you can bring everyone your insights about the upcoming Steve Thomas book. Regards, Mandarin [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "Sorry Pedro ..." Posted by mandarin on 16:26:10 3/18/2000 Can't believe I forgot to put Lacey's name at the beginning of my sentence above. You are however, an honorable mention. At least you got to be the best for a few seconds. Does this mean that people like DimWit and Ribaldone cannot get in here? Or the posters who changed their hats, too? Regards, Mandarin [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Mandarin...." Posted by Pedro on 07:06:50 3/19/2000 .....I think they all can come here and post. Regarding the FW/MW *thing* I agree with you, we don't have enough information so far to connect the JBR murder with FW, I am NOT telling (some people could be very nervious) I don't believe she's been abused, I just said that I haven't any reliable information leading me to accept a connection between FW senior and JBR. In this case, I prefer to wait fore things to be more settle down. Pedro [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Pedro ...." Posted by mandarin on 21:19:37 3/21/2000 You know I actually listened to the broadcast between MW and Mame and quite frankly I thought it was more one-sided and leading the interviewee than the recent BabWa interview with the Rams. MW hardly spoke at all and when she did speak the tone of her voice did not in any way resemble someone who was fearful of her life. It all seemed to be so ohhh what's the word I'm looking for, contrived maybe. Well anyway, it was totally unconvincing and seemed like a perfect waste of time to me, but hey that's just my opinion. I was however really astounded at the amount of oridinarily bright posters who bought into it so readily. What then can I say about what they have to say about the Rams? I fully believe the Rams are responsible in one way or the other, but trashing Fleet & Priscilla White, based on a perfect stranger did give me pause. Regards, Mandarin [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "MSE" Posted by Lacey on 05:48:14 3/22/2000 (My Sentiments Exactly.) The purpose of the whole thing? To embarrass the White's and do damage to their credibility. Anyone who is convinced of anything more sinister than that is a gullible seagull. Mandarin, you go girl! Lace . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Mandarin and Lacey...." Posted by Pedro on 08:06:18 3/22/2000 ...I didn't listen to the interview between Mame and MW, that's why I don't have an opinion at all about it, but FW is been look at by many people and until today I know of no evidence against him. I personally feel much sorry for any person abused for any reason, that don't make me loss my own mind and accuse of these serious crimes to FW, I still can't see the connection between MW and FW. I don't know who could be helped by these allegations against FW, but they don't even help the R's at this point on time. I think the posters here are bright, they were just boried latelly with no news and they are frustrated with the way justice is working on this case. Anyway, this is a very serious matter and I am very eskepthical and carefull. I would like to remind some of us of the fact that what could convince us of a person's guilt, hasn't necessary to be accepted in court as evidence, the cases must be won in court, not in the press, sincerelly, as a lawyer, I will always advice my customers the same way the R's lawyers did and I will behave the same way they did, I will be much concern about finding the killer of my daughter, but much more about the living members of my family, guilty or not, they have been succesfully protected by their lawyers and that's the best you could possible get. This is just my opinion, some of you will not agree with me, and I accept that fact too, the greatness of human relations is that we can accept variety. Pedro [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Pedro, Etc ....." Posted by mandarin on 12:52:48 3/22/2000 You're probably right about the boredom & tedium striking a lot of posters. At times, in the beginning I tended to be side tracke, like the rest of the world with all the different angles to the case. BUT, this MW thing, coming as it did, at the exact time of the Ramsey TV ambush, was more than a coinkydink for me. The JW forum beats all other forums on Jonbenet & I believe the Rams know this all too well. My feeling is that the forum was heavily infected by the Ram support team in the past few weeks and it would serve their purpose well to have people chasing more Kim Ballard types. After all, people tuning into the JW forum for the first time out of curiosity, would perhaps think the Rams were correct in labelling us with a lynch type mentality, were they to read all the posts bashing the Whites & talking ad nauseum about sex rings in Boulder and a mystery woman. Let's hope that all the intelligent posters will get right back on their original track, where they were so brilliant at bisecting & disecting this world famous whodunnit, even when they didn't agree as to which one of the Ramseys was the catalyst. Lacey, love that seagull line. Regards, Mandarin [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "I know...." Posted by Ginja on 19:18:50 5/26/2000 ...no one's posted in this thread for months, but what the hey! This looked like the best thread to vent. What happened to the JW forum???!!! Who are all these know-it-alls that come in like storm troopers? Is this a takeover or what? It's bad enough practically everyone's opening up their own threads...on the same topic! I mean, jeesh! how many different ways can you talk about a polygraph test that has absolutely no value? I could handle that, though. It's the meaness of other posters...particularly Paralegal. She has snowed everyone! How has she done that? By berating and belittling me! She couldn't find her way out of a wet paper bag with a machete! Except with her razor tongue when she lashes it out on me. People are blind when they can't see that the only way a person can make something of themself is to put down someone else. She never sticks to topic with me, and she never answers questions. She just insults...these are personal insults. I don't know...it's not worth it. As a matter of fact, speaking of what's not worth anything...she insulted me out of the blue, without provocation, and instead of playing her game, I simply posted she wasn't worth it. Her response? Another personal attack. That's what JW has turned into...a haven for cruel people who are allowed to attack others. No matter what I post, Paralegal's right there on the attack...on the personal attack...and getting away with it. I used to love this forum. It's a shame it turned into a haven for people who feel the need to personally attack others. It's even worse that they get away with it! I guess intimidation can go a long way! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL Ginja ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. " Some thoughts" Posted by sarah on 17:24:01 5/28/2000 I hear you, Ginja, and agree, and in your honor, I am doing a Ginja post- you know -one that is longer than War and Peace, lol. I'm gonna bitch about plagiarism here first, because I think it is a bad, bad thing. and then I'd like to bring up some other thoughts. I don't like plagiarism. I've seen it done to others, and I've had it done to myself. Friday a.m., I posted a new thread. Just a few hours later a poster took the ideas in that thread, (in other words, the information I was posting about), which was on the board maybe 7 to 10 threads down, and started a brand new thread. My husband, who in real life is a tiger, said I should call attention to it. "Silence is compliance", he said. I just shrugged, opened the refrigerator and ate a few sour grapes... I figured if I said anything, the poster would feign ignorance, or a debate would ensue, with other posters feeling some need to take sides, and we all know finger pointing on a public forum can get ugly. I checked back every once in a while Friday. My thread went mostly unanswered, and nobody else called attention to the similarities. For a poster, it's the kind of thing that makes you want to go, huh? It's the kind of thing that makes you scratch your head and mumble,.. "What the f---?".. ESPECIALLY if the week isn't even over, and this is the second or third similar circumstance... In another similar circumstance , with another poster, who has done this kind of thing a minimum of twice to me, I did call attention to it - directly to the poster- directly on the board, but I masked the messages, so as not to embarrass this person. I wanted ' ---- ' to know I was aware of it, and ' -----' needed to make a few amendments to his/her thread. .. So what happened? The poster simply ignored my posts and continued to address everyone else. =============================================================== My 10 cents about MW, and the fallout from the melee that took place a few weeks ago. All the fighting took me by surprise. I guess I am neither perceptive nor wise, because in retrospect, it is easy to see this didn't happen over night. I was one of those who was curious about the sex-ring , ritual abuse angle, because this particular theory does tie a lot of loose ends together. However, I do believe Jon Benet's parents are AT THE LEAST in it up to their snouts, and are directly involved. What I have the most trouble with in this scenario, is grasping ANY reason WHY these extremely wealthy, 'Christian' people would loan their daughter out? For sex games? A porno shoot? Why? These people didn't need the money OR the possible future defamation. A sex thing just for the sex of it? Why? Why would they risk the exposure? John could have any kind of tart he wanted, with HIS money and connections, especially in Amsterdam... A Strange Religion Thing? Well maybe, but the people we must next suspect that are also involved don't appear to be as 'religious' as the Rams. It would almost be a relief to discount all the above possible scenarios. But some things, like neon lights, simply can not be ignored, and until we have some answers, some of us will continue to consider every angle. Some that come to mind are: 1: The Stines 2: The fact that Team Ramsey is NOT using MW and her allegations to their advantage. 3: The early , 'grooming' of Jon Benet, and her bed-wetting and soiling. Was she 2 or 3 years old when the snapshot of her was taken while she was dressed in a tight bathing suit, face and hair made-up, and she was wearing little slave-sandals. Her baby-fat was still apparent on her little legs! Yes, maybe Patsy was just being 'creative', but if so, the woman was also extremely naïve. That particular picture of Jon Benet to a pedophile, is roughly equivalent to full length female nudity to a male... 4: The most haunting, irrepressible thought, to me: The total and blatantly obvious lack of remorse. They can not even fake remorse, and if caught off-guard, neither seems to care less about "that child". Why? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The other thing I'd like to get off my chest is some additional comment on the above posts, and I agree with all of you.: Some people on this forum were viciously attacked. Normal debate was cast aside and personal attacks were chosen in its place. I got hit, and I have to say the poster took me by surprise, since I thought she and I got along well. I have come here from some other sites, battle-weary and virtually wounded. It doesn't take a lot to knock me over these days. As a result of that one attack, I have been posting a lot less, and the thread I mentioned earlier was the first I've done since the MW melee.. The reason I am citing my own case, is I fear the same thing, in one way or the other, may have happened to some of JW's best posters. Is there anything we can do to reconcile some recent failures? If you suspect so and so has been adversely affected, perhaps an email to them might help, just to let them know you support them, no matter what theory differences you might have. It really helps, I know. Three people who post on JW and other various boards have helped me recover in the past. Since I rarely get 'kudos' on the board, and just as few responses, I tend to think of my presence on the forum as one that nobody would ever miss if I just went away and died somewhere. I think a good idea that needs due consideration would be for Chris and/or China to install a truly private, member's only room, even if I would not be deemed acceptable to enter. Here's one reason why. Chris and China, I hope you read this. Your best posters need and merit a place to let off steam, relax, unwind, refresh, renew and reinvigorate. They currently have no such place, that I am aware anyway, and the landscape of JW is always shifting subtly, due to the addition of newbies and , as we saw last week, changes in the flow of the case. The posters above are remarking that things have changed. If your oldest, best, trusted, posters are jaded by a changing forum, how can you give them the strength and reinforcement they need to carry on? The JW forum almost seems like a wasteland to me now. I would like to say more, but in this open environment, such remarks would be inappropriate. When you need to talk privately with your closest allies, your friends or your spouse, do you invite the world to listen in? And if the world IS listening in, WILL you talk in private? Perhaps you could start with just a few trusted posters. Anyone else admitted would be by majority vote of the members. Give your stars and your oldest sages, who have been faithful to you and JW their own special place to unwind. They certainly deserve it. And if you want to keep JW at it's optimum, it may be the only answer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL sarah ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Sarah..." Posted by 7kluz on 23:44:11 5/28/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 23:44:11, 5/28/2000 I agree; I think this happens frequently and it really P!sses me off when someone takes credit for someone elses ideas, discoveries and hard work. There is one poster (I'll not mention names) that makes a habit of stealing other peoples posts (or ideas). Someone needs to address this issue. I enjoy JW, but not the Chit that has been going on lately. Ginja, I noticed the animosity between you and Paralegal. I wasn't sure why all that began, but I had to wonder about all the attacks on you. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "7 Kluz" Posted by sarah on 11:05:03 5/29/2000 Thanks for the response. I'm honestly glad to hear you noticed plagiarism going on too. I'm wondering if it has happened to you personally, and of course, I'm wondering if you and I are talking about one of the same posters. And you are right about all the hard work and research. One of the posters I mentioned above actually disagreed with some of my findings a long while back on another forum. We debated, and I explained in detail why I believed as I did.. This poster took my information, indeed, the very words I used, took it to JW, and started a new thread with 'His/her' "brand-new" theory. I was really hurt, because I had respected this poster. This poster, btw, never even came back to me and said thank you. This poster is somewhat highly respected on this board today; and no one knows the brunt of his/her theories came from me, on another board, a long time ago... And along this line, there is a new onslaught of newbies - and it reminds me of ants at a picnic table. They are posting helter-skelter - anything goes, and some of them are so new to the case, they are starting new threads about Ramsey interviews on television; totally unaware these interviews are re-runs. It gives you an idea how new to the case they are! Somebody decided to dedicate a thread to a poem. Somebody else copied the idea and started another new thread, which was also a poem... Chris, we need you! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Sarah..." Posted by 7kluz on 15:05:03 5/30/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 15:05:03, 5/30/2000 What floored me was that Chris asked us to conserve bandwidth, however that doesn't stop some posters from pasting entire stories from URL's that have been posted previously by another person. I thought URL's are posted in consideration of others, who then have the choice to click on them or not. Please correct me if I am wrong...becuz I have posted URL's myself for that specific reason. Ah, Lace...this is the workout room...please let us vent. ;-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Yo Ginj" Posted by Lacey on 13:39:40 5/27/2000 Hang tough good to see you and I WISH you could post during the week!! Ha ha! I don't post much on weekends so here we are like two ships that pass in the night. How is your job? You must be working your ass off, well I KNOW you are if you put in half the effort at work that you do on the forum. You keep posting and I'll keep disagreeing, lol, and I don't know what Paralegal's game is but s/he sure is fond of Darnay, eh? What's up with that Well I am going to go over there and READ THREADS ONLY, lol, anybody who sees me posting can send me a freaking virus 'cause I ain't in the mood to post today so there Except, if Lake is posting, I think I will have him for lunch LOL Lacey . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Sarah" Posted by China on 21:15:20 5/28/2000 Wanted you to know I read your post and will give it some serious thought. As always, thanks for the sincere advice and input. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "thank you" Posted by sarah on 11:12:16 5/29/2000 China, and I do hope you take it to heart! Not to beat a dead horse, but the word I was looking for in the post above, more appropriately, was "regroup". That word says it all. Is Pedro behaving? He is a joy in chat. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "Hey!" Posted by Gemini on 15:53:52 5/29/2000 How come I just walked on in here today without having to sign in? Is WOR open to the public now? First time I've seen this thread. Ginja, I don't understand paralegal either, mostly because I hadn't noticed that hat before the blasts at you. Was it already here? Tell ya what, tho ... there have always been a few meanies. I don't think you pick up on it unless it's coming your way :-) . Sarah, I've noticed a little of the 'idea lifting' from time to time, but just chalked it up to the source. That's always gone on (off and on) to some extent. The only time it's irritated me a little was when the DW thang used some pieces of my old posts ... lifted them word for word ... and sandwiched them between a lot of goofy stuff. That's why I didn't believe that hat was a real newbie, and still don't. It was interesting to see who ran to pat h/sh/it on the back. Isn't forum culture wunnerful :-) . Just noticed TFP is back in business. Off to read some there. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "The Rules (lol)" Posted by Lacey on 19:01:04 5/29/2000 Oh for crying out loud, as if nobody, or no two people, or more, even, can have the same original thought, jeeez. And just because somebody posts an idea first does not mean they can lay claim to it all over the freaking Internet. I mean, I could have a case too, with that Steve Thomas guy copying my theory and ideas INTO A BOOK that I am getting like, NOOOOO royalties from, and you don't see ME going off on a bitch-and-moan session do you? DO YOU?! He stole my ideas. However, I have decided to give that man the benefit of the doubt and say that he VALIDATED my ideas, instead. It's the mature thing to do LOL grow up sarah Lacey . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "What the hell" Posted by Watching you on 05:15:09 5/31/2000 are youse guys bitching about now? Can't leave you alone for five minutes, y'all get in trouble. It is good to see you are starting to get the picture, but I am afraid you're going to have to dig a little deeper to figure out the modus operandi here. You are smart little dickens', all of you. Lacey is my kid, so naturally she's got it - well, most of it - but she isn't thinking dirty enough, yet. Hey, what rhymes with jameson? I don't know who's doing what right now - haven't been around for the past few days to read. It's been damn nice, too, like I've been liberated. The WOR, though, that's another story altogether. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "Who the hell is" Posted by Watching you on 05:29:06 5/31/2000 the fruit person? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "Mandarin" Posted by Watching you on 05:34:06 5/31/2000 you are right, but look deeper. Notice how many of the instigators are fairly new posters. Go back and start putting two and two together. All is not what it seems to be, there is mischief afoot. Be suspicious of seemingly innocent statements. Be even more suspicious of the wolves in sheep's clothing. Sheep is plural, you know, so sheep's is correct. Gotta teach youse guys everything. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "Huh?" Posted by Chris on 06:48:03 5/31/2000 I guess when it all begins to feel personal maybe it's time to throw in the towel, huh. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "Not sure what" Posted by Watching you on 09:12:23 5/31/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 09:12:23, 5/31/2000 I may have misinterpreted here. I guess I'm getting paranoid. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "." Posted by China on 09:18:08 5/31/2000 I love the WOR. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "And I love you, China" Posted by Watching you on 09:39:22 5/31/2000 in a sort of way. Heh [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "Where's Sparky?" Posted by Watching you on 09:47:31 5/31/2000 She needs to get her butt over here. We could have a reunion of sorts. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 30. "I am curious...." Posted by gail on 16:18:58 5/31/2000 I have been a reader of JW for quite a while now, over a year at least. I seldom post, for some reason being a non American living in another country I don't often feel qualified to post. I come to JW everyday to keep-up and was just as sad as most when we have lost friends of JW. I have only been to the WOR a few times and this is the first time in many months, forgive me however, because I just don't get this thread, am I correct in thinking that you all are upset that there are a lot of newbies at JW, if so why, I remember at the beginning of the new year there were a couple of threads dedicated to enticing lurkers to come out of the wood work....so they come out...and now it seems you want them to crawl back...perhaps you should gently educate them about the JW forum and the rules before you decide to become an exclusive club. I thought the purpose of the JFJBR forum was to find justice for this little girl murdered it seems by her parents.....please think about the dialogue here and the true reason for the forum,my mom always taught me that two heads are better than one when trying to solve a problem. Without prejudice, mom of two from T.O. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL gail ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 31. "Well Gail" Posted by Chris on 19:20:10 5/31/2000 I've sort of been wondering the same thing myself. Maybe someone will come along and set both of us straight. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 32. "Well I'm far from straight...." Posted by China on 07:55:44 6/01/2000 heh. But Chris, a couple of days ago I went to the archives, aaaiiiieee, a scary place, to look for the most recent thread you had started on Forum Rules. If I say so myself, I had a darn good post there about what and what not to do, and thought I'd just bring up the whole darn thread again. Alas, I couldn't find it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 33. "Gail" Posted by 1000Sparks on 08:03:45 6/01/2000 veryone is welcome, right Chris? We don't care where you are from. Keep posting. The WOR is for talking filthy (not me but others) or talking about chickens and stuff like that. Where is TO? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 34. "Thankyou1000sparks" Posted by gail on 14:24:21 6/01/2000 for the welcome I will continue to post.....when I feel I can contribute something to the forum... BTW T.O.= Toronto Canada [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL gail ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 37. "Gail" Posted by Orsen on 21:13:06 6/02/2000 Hi, I live just up the 400 from you in Barrie. TO, such a safe, clean city eh? Try and post more so I can find you on the forum. Chris, thanks for all your hard work. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 35. "Gail!" Posted by Sailer on 09:39:56 6/02/2000 You don't hafta wait until you feel you can contribute something! Heck, Sparky and Watching You post all the time without contributing anything!!! HAH!!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 36. "WOR.." Posted by Pedro on 12:33:23 6/02/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 12:33:23, 6/02/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 12:29:36, 6/02/2000 ...is great!!! and we come here to atatck sparky...'cause she deserve it and scare us. WY: I thought Sparky was looking for chickens :-). Gail, welcome, Sailer is the *welcome commite* just be care full when he drinks those viagra gimlets :-) Lacey: I think we should make rules, like....don't be polite to the girls, if you can be nasty :-). And other one, all us should be obedient to our moderator and give her hell, she likes it !!! :-). Pedro [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 38. "hi Orsen" Posted by gail on 04:54:37 6/03/2000 i didn't know there were more people from Ontario around the forum, thanks for the welcome and I will try to post more often, and actually I just use T.O. because people recognize the name I actually live in Brampton, which I guess is part of the GTA. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL gail ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 39. "Hi Everyone ..." Posted by mandarin on 22:56:04 6/24/2000 I think what "work outers" are trying to say is that at times they feel snookered, but having regard for the particular thread they happen to be on, they choose the wise route of scrolling by, but in the end, they are human and need a place to work out the source of their frustration, thus the 'Workout Room', where the byline says, "anything goes" and I presume they stand by that. In the beginning, actually for the first year or so I would be bothered by people infiltrating or screwing up the threads, but then I came to old mama's best advice ... "ignore them and they will go away". Usually (95% of the time) I am able to do this. The only exception was the complete and utter disregard for the White family and then later, the thrashing of Steve Thomas, prior to his book even coming out. Let's face it, we all, (BPD, FBI, DA, posters, etc.) have to work with extremely limited resources when the main characters in this tragic play, namely Patsy & John have become their attorney's ventriloquist of the millennium. Never anything new from this deadly duo, just more and more b.s. and posturing. No matter what this forum has done to any of us, let's put that aside and be grateful that, in fact the Ramseys really didn't get away with anything, at least in the court of public opinion, and WE ALL KNOW that the court of public opinion was much more valuable to both of them than any other justice court in the world that they can beat with their bulging bag of cash. They have cash but no class and ya just can't buy it, nor can cash give you a nice comfortable rest in the "Arms of Morpheus" each and every night of your life. Their prisoners of themselves, of JW, of their lawyers, of the media, of their friends and best of all, any future prospects they ever had of building their dwindling fortune. There is justice after all ... so instead of bothering with the Ram infiltrators on the threads (except here, that's a given) let's make a pact to scroll by and totally ignore any bogus poster. They do give signs you know, you just have to learn how NOT TO RESPOND TO THEM ON JW. BTW, Hi Lacey, knew I'd find you here somewhere. Regards, Mandarin [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 40. "...hahaha" Posted by jonesy on 15:08:27 6/25/2000 .thanks for sharing...but I don't run with pacts..... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 41. "pacts?" Posted by Watching you on 04:49:15 6/26/2000 pacts = packs I've got your back, jones. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]