Justice Watch Support JW "New York Post vs. Mary Keenan (new suit!)" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... New York Post vs. Mary Keenan (new suit!), MrsBrady, 05:34:59, 3/30/2001 lmao, sarah, 05:44:40, 3/30/2001, (#1) The TABS, Bobby, 05:48:09, 3/30/2001, (#2) Mary Keenan, Holly, 05:48:39, 3/30/2001, (#3) Would it be possible....., rose, 06:09:24, 3/30/2001, (#4) This is as interesting, Watching you, 06:17:30, 3/30/2001, (#5) hmmmm, Chris, 06:20:39, 3/30/2001, (#6) WY, janab, 06:23:21, 3/30/2001, (#7) New York Post, MrsBrady, 06:32:57, 3/30/2001, (#10) remember jade barrymore?, mary99, 06:30:57, 3/30/2001, (#9) OH, my error, Watching you, 06:26:37, 3/30/2001, (#8) Imus , Bobby, 06:40:12, 3/30/2001, (#11) ..and.., luvsflowers, 06:52:44, 3/30/2001, (#13) Isn't that a bit of, Watching you, 06:46:13, 3/30/2001, (#12) Thank you, Mrs Brady, Greenleaf, 06:56:50, 3/30/2001, (#14) Yea!, gaiabetsy, 07:51:42, 3/30/2001, (#16) Thanks, momo, 07:49:59, 3/30/2001, (#15) Ramseys vs New York Post, pinker, 08:02:08, 3/30/2001, (#17) Oh, now I get it, Watching you, 08:09:26, 3/30/2001, (#18) No Defense, sarah, 08:19:53, 3/30/2001, (#19) Fox News and NY Post, Cassandra, 09:38:03, 3/30/2001, (#20) Guess What, janphi, 09:46:34, 3/30/2001, (#22) Watching You...lol..., Cassandra, 09:40:17, 3/30/2001, (#21) Goody, Woody.., Greenleaf, 09:57:10, 3/30/2001, (#24) Great News!, LurkerXIV, 09:53:14, 3/30/2001, (#23) wunnerful, wunnerful, starry, 11:49:57, 3/30/2001, (#25) Monday...., rose, 12:35:24, 3/30/2001, (#26) ................................................................... "New York Post vs. Mary Keenan (new suit!)" Posted by MrsBrady on 05:34:59 3/30/2001 From the AP this morning buried in a Ramsey vs. Thomas story... "Meanwhile, the Boulder County district attorney has asked a federal judge to stop the New York Post from seeing stacks of documents from the Ramsey investigation. "The newspaper is seeking all documents associated with the slaying, including those from the grand jury which disbanded without indicting anyone in the case. "The district attorney's motion to block the Post's subpoenas was filed Thursday (3-29) in federal court in Denver. It argued the subpoena places an undue burden on the office since it includes tens of thousands of documents in 24 categories, some of which are privileged "The subpoena, issued March 15, orders the district attorney's office to hand the documents over Monday." Kewell... 03-30-2001 New York Post Mary Keenan
Subpoena
All Documents
On JBR Case Current [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "lmao" Posted by sarah on 05:44:40 3/30/2001 So...Keenan doesn't want the media, (and the public) to have access to the files because it's too much work for her?..lmao. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "The TABS" Posted by Bobby on 05:48:09 3/30/2001 will be all over this one. Thanks Mrs. B :) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Mary Keenan" Posted by Holly on 05:48:39 3/30/2001 not only is a jackass - she's a lazy jackass. If she would spend less time vacationing and designing her office, she'd have more time at the copy machine. Just turn it over goofball, you're not doing anything else with it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "Would it be possible....." Posted by rose on 06:09:24 3/30/2001 to get copies of the suit and MK's answer to the courts? Surely she said more than it would create a hardship on her office to copy and turn over records? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "This is as interesting" Posted by Watching you on 06:17:30 3/30/2001 as the Ramseys' suit against ST. The NYT carries a lot of clout. I wonder why they are so hot on getting their hands on those records, aside from the fact that everyone would like to have them. I can hear the shredders cranking up as I write - talk about hardship - all those office workers putting in overtime, shredding all those incriminating records. Go get 'em, NYT [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "hmmmm" Posted by Chris on 06:20:39 3/30/2001 I'm thinking that Darnay might have something to do with this one. He's pretty tight with the folks at the NY Post it seems. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "WY" Posted by janab on 06:23:21 3/30/2001 It's the New York Post, not the New York Times. Probably still some clout there, though. . janab [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "New York Post" Posted by MrsBrady on 06:32:57 3/30/2001 is owned by News Corporation... "The News Corporation Limited (NYSE: NWS, NWS.A; ASX: NCP, NCPDP; LSE: NEWCP) is one of the world's largest media companies with total assets as of September 30, 2000 of approximately US$38 billion and total annual revenues of approximately US$14 billion. News Corporation's diversified global operations in the United States, Canada, continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, Latin America and the Pacific Basin include the production and distribution of motion pictures and television programming; television, satellite and cable broadcasting; the publication of newspapers, magazines and books; the production and distribution of promotional and advertising products and services; the development of digital broadcasting; the development of conditional access and subscriber management systems; and the creation and distribution of popular on-line programming." [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "remember jade barrymore?" Posted by mary99 on 06:30:57 3/30/2001 The NYP had the scoop on her midnight bail arrangements with DH. I hope the federal judge laughs that lame excuse for not turning documents over right out of court. Going through all those tens of thousands of documents might be just what this case needs to breathe some life back into it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "OH, my error" Posted by Watching you on 06:26:37 3/30/2001 not as much clout, but enough to make Mary Keenen has stress, LOL. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Imus " Posted by Bobby on 06:40:12 3/30/2001 He always pushes the Post on National radio and TV. Maybe he'll start talking on the morning show about the case again. Fingers crossed here. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "..and.." Posted by luvsflowers on 06:52:44 3/30/2001 maybe we can get them to try to get the as yet, never before released to the public, search warrant that was issued on Dec 26,1996 for an undisclosed property in Boulder County. The search warrant that was protecting peoples whose names were not yet public and may still not yet be public. But the public does have a right to know after all this time. Heck maybe if they release all the info WE can solve the crime. The DA sure doesnt seem to be able to. Does anyone have an email address where we can let them know about this issue? luvs [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Isn't that a bit of" Posted by Watching you on 06:46:13 3/30/2001 a silly excuse, anyways? Why didn't she just say there is an on-going investigation and she can't release the documents because of that. Something isn't making sense here. Has this ever been done before? Are they going by Freedom of Information Act? What is going on here? Holy Batman, if they can get these records, man oh man alive, what a coup. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "Thank you, Mrs Brady" Posted by Greenleaf on 06:56:50 3/30/2001 Now that is a meaningful piece of news! It may spell the beginning of the end, for not only the Rams, but for dear old Alex. GL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Yea!" Posted by gaiabetsy on 07:51:42 3/30/2001 The more BIG POWERFUL people and organizations who push to get all the info about this case released, the more likely we'll all get to see it soon. Go, Darnay! I'll bet you have had something to do with this! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Thanks" Posted by momo on 07:49:59 3/30/2001 Mrs. Brady. Looks like the Smit is about to hit the fan. What a lazy ass Keenan is. No wonder she doesn't want to solve the case. She can't even make it to the copier. LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "Ramseys vs New York Post" Posted by pinker on 08:02:08 3/30/2001 is the suit behind this crisis. They must be out trying to get evidence to defend their stories as they are currently being sued by Ramseys. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "Oh, now I get it" Posted by Watching you on 08:09:26 3/30/2001 this is what I thought should have happened when the Rams sued the tabs for Burke. How can anyone defend themselves without access to records that are buried deep in Boulderdum? So, the Post is going after those records as part of their defense, and they are, after all, entitled to put on a vigorous defense. Hot damn, the plot thickens. Things are going to get ugly, folks, and I think they are going to get ugliest for the Rams. Psst, Lin Wood, your pants are on fire. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "No Defense" Posted by sarah on 08:19:53 3/30/2001 Keenan's lame excuse is funny; but it is also very telling. It shows us in no uncertain terms that the DAs are still about protecting themselves and shielding the murderer(s), and to what extent they are willing to go to do so. She dare not use the excuse that the murder investigation is on-going, because she knows she may well have to prove that statement in court, and in doing so it will leave herself and her office wide open for even more investigation. She has to tread veer-ry softly now. She is in deep water, as evidenced by her inability to provide anything but a lame and utterly laughable excuse as to why she refused to turn over the documents willingly. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Fox News and NY Post" Posted by Cassandra on 09:38:03 3/30/2001 If there's news, Fox will have it. They are both Murdoch owned. Amen, Holly, about Keenan. Well said. lol The 'Natl. Enquirer' has been all over daytime this week, with ads about the Ramsey interview and change of story. If you serve cookies and hugs to the media, are you a public person? Does this make it a social event? Cassie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "Guess What" Posted by janphi on 09:46:34 3/30/2001 >If you serve cookies and hugs to >the media, are you a public >person? Does this make it a >social event? Cassie -- big shocker! Woodie says they DIDN'T!!! That it's all a lie!!! LOLOLOL!!! I guess he'd sue, but as he says, no one puts any stock in what those rags report, anyway! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Watching You...lol..." Posted by Cassandra on 09:40:17 3/30/2001 your Yoo hoo to Linwoodie that his pants are on fire! lol Cassie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "Goody, Woody.." Posted by Greenleaf on 09:57:10 3/30/2001 [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "Great News!" Posted by LurkerXIV on 09:53:14 3/30/2001 I'm happy to see that the press is doing its job of investigative journalism in the Ramsey case. Forget about waiting for lame-o Keenan to do anything...she's Alex in a dress. Well, here comes that huge steamroller right down Ramsey Lane. That'll take the hot air out of the Umbrella People. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "wunnerful, wunnerful" Posted by starry on 11:49:57 3/30/2001 To quote our dear departed Pan. Ya know they're all up there raising hell and stirring this recent chit up, don't ya's? Ruthee nor Pan never were the quiet type of gals. Shaking those clouds until a Scamsey falls out, methinks. What will next month bring? Will Woody sue the Scamseys? Hey, anythings possible. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "Monday...." Posted by rose on 12:35:24 3/30/2001 The AP article said that the NYP was suppose to get the material from DA's office by Monday. So does that mean we will hear the Judges ruling this coming Monday? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]