Justice Watch Support JW "Support Steve" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... Support Steve, momo, 07:27:17, 3/30/2001 Yo, Steve,, gaiabetsy, 07:41:17, 3/30/2001, (#1) Let the games begin!, Greenleaf, 08:00:49, 3/30/2001, (#2) Plenty of support here, Bobby, 08:10:37, 3/30/2001, (#3) Defamation isn't, Watching you, 08:18:15, 3/30/2001, (#5) Momo & Steve, Earthangel, 08:17:28, 3/30/2001, (#4) Some Libel Law, New York Lawyer, 08:49:53, 3/30/2001, (#6) Thanks, NYL, Cassandra, 09:09:06, 3/30/2001, (#7) Steve, JR, 09:59:32, 3/30/2001, (#8) Go Steve!, freebird, 10:11:37, 3/30/2001, (#10) Earthangel, momo, 10:05:44, 3/30/2001, (#9) Best wishes, Steve., Twitch, 10:15:49, 3/30/2001, (#11) LOL, Momo, Edie Pratt, 10:25:25, 3/30/2001, (#12) Edie , momo, 10:29:52, 3/30/2001, (#13) Momo Thomas, Edie Pratt, 10:35:00, 3/30/2001, (#14) Edie, momo, 11:41:33, 3/30/2001, (#17) Steve Thomas, Tricia, 10:52:19, 3/30/2001, (#15) Turn It Up Steve!, RiverRat, 11:33:02, 3/30/2001, (#16) that's a good question, RR!, Edie Pratt, 11:52:29, 3/30/2001, (#19) ST & NYL:, listener, 11:48:37, 3/30/2001, (#18) Hey Steve, starry, 11:53:58, 3/30/2001, (#20) Yes Yes, Tricia, 12:08:18, 3/30/2001, (#22) Edie and all, momo, 12:06:33, 3/30/2001, (#21) How About St. Martin's Press?, Red, 12:26:06, 3/30/2001, (#24) it doesn't work, Edie Pratt, 12:20:28, 3/30/2001, (#23) Edie, momo, 13:14:42, 3/30/2001, (#26) forget it, Momo, Edie Pratt, 13:52:28, 3/30/2001, (#28) ok, Tricia, 13:10:49, 3/30/2001, (#25) Steve, doScubie, 13:39:10, 3/30/2001, (#27) Steve, Nedthan Johns, 14:02:06, 3/30/2001, (#29) Dear Steve ...., Mandarin, 14:52:05, 3/30/2001, (#30) NYL ..., Mandarin, 15:14:51, 3/30/2001, (#31) Go Steve, South, 15:34:58, 3/30/2001, (#33) I think they are whistling, Cassandra, 15:30:08, 3/30/2001, (#32) Steve, whitefox, 16:03:05, 3/30/2001, (#35) Cassie, momo, 15:36:28, 3/30/2001, (#34) Momo...&...whitefox, Cassandra, 16:07:06, 3/30/2001, (#36) Thanks, whitefox, 16:19:26, 3/30/2001, (#37) Gerry Spence...., rose, 16:32:52, 3/30/2001, (#38) Dan Petrocelli, Edie Pratt, 16:36:59, 3/30/2001, (#39) Petrocelli, Barbara53, 17:16:59, 3/30/2001, (#40) Gerry Spence, Mini, 18:13:52, 3/30/2001, (#41) ................................................................... "Support Steve" Posted by momo on 07:27:17 3/30/2001 I'm posting this thread for messages to Steve Thomas in support of him in the recent development of the lawsuit filed by the Ramseys. Even though I think this lawsuit is a slam-dunker, it would still be nice to show our support to him. I'll be writing him a letter to let him know we support him and that he can read here to find that we're in his corner. Steve, I'll be praying for you and your family. I'll also be praying for the others mentioned in the lawsuit. I know that your #1 goal is for JfJBR. It always has been. Just know that we are behind you every step of the way and that you have us on your side. God bless you for being a man of honor and courage. JonBenet is so blessed to have you. Thanks for all you've done thus far. [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "Yo, Steve," Posted by gaiabetsy on 07:41:17 3/30/2001 you've been a brave guy to step out in the light and let the world know THE OTHER SIDE of this case that the DA and the Rams didn't want us to know. Hope you don't end up being the scapegoat and suffering unduly. Just know there are an awful lot of people in your corner. No, we can't go through this standing right by your side, but we are here and we'll always be here. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "Let the games begin!" Posted by Greenleaf on 08:00:49 3/30/2001 Dear Steve, You probably have no earthly idea how many people are rooting for you. I can only add, for what it is worth, my sincerest wishes for your absolute victory! SBTC (Steve Beats The Criminals) Greenleaf [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Plenty of support here" Posted by Bobby on 08:10:37 3/30/2001 Ref my post #23 on Ram vs ST suit thread. Now we shall see those in CO (including the GUV) who will be stand with ST and against more Ramspin. Go get'm Steve! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "Defamation isn't" Posted by Watching you on 08:19:55 3/30/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 08:19:55, 3/30/2001 the biggest gripe the Rams have with ST. Their biggest beef is ST made them look like fools on Larry King Live, something they desperately wanted, and needed (for their egos) to control. It's all about control with the Rams, and anyone who dares to challenge them and does so effectively, will get sued. It's a control thing. This is all about vindictiveness and getting even. They are pathetic. Edited to add - yes, Steve Thomas has my support 100%, but not because his book influenced me one way or the other. His book only reinforced what I already knew or suspected. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "Momo & Steve" Posted by Earthangel on 08:17:28 3/30/2001 Momo - This is a wonderful idea. I'm glad you thought of it. Steve- As was mentioned before, I'm sure you have "no Earthly idea" about the number of people who are on your side, the side of justice for JBR. We will all be praying for you and your family. I know we all agree that the time has come for the light of the truth to shine on this case. We're all rooting for you Steve. GO GETUM!!! ea JfJBR [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "Some Libel Law" Posted by New York Lawyer on 08:49:53 3/30/2001 The 1996 case of Church of Scientology International v. Time Warner (932 F.Supp 589, SDNY) has an informative discussion of several libel defenses that someone like Steve Thomas can use (besides the defense of truth). Quoting from the decision: "There are three relevant related doctrines under which courts have granted judgment for defendants in libel suits: (1) the libel-proof plaintiff doctrine, (2) the incremental harm doctrine, and (3) the subsidiary meaning doctrine. Because these separate doctrines have not always been distinguished, and because the terms are not used consistently, some definition of the doctrines for purposes of this Opinion is in order. (1) The libel-proof plaintiff doctrine reasons that when a particular plaintiff's reputation for a particular trait is sufficiently bad, further statements regarding that trait, even if false and made with malice, are not actionable because, as a matter of law, the plaintiff cannot be damaged in his reputation as to that trait. (2) The incremental harm doctrine reasons that when unchallenged or nonactionable parts of a particular publication are damaging, another statement, though maliciously false, might be nonactionable on the grounds that it causes no harm beyond the harm caused by the remainder of the publication. (3) The subsidiary meaning doctrine reasons that where a maliciously false statement implies the same ultimate conclusion as that of the remainder of the publication, which has been published without actual malice, a plaintiff cannot "base his defamation action solely on inaccuracies contained within statements subsidiary to these larger views." (pp.593-94) ONE FINAL OBSERVATION: As a lawyer, I can tell the Ramseys think they may have problems with their case. The tip-off is the fact that it is obvious from their complaint that they actually intend to argue for the lower standard of proof (preponderance of the evidence as against clear and convincing, and negligent rather than intentional falsity, i.e. actual malice). This lower standard is reserved solely for "private persons" who have not injected themselves into a case by giving press conferences, appearing in documentaries, written a bestselling book and gone on a media tour promoting it. If the Ramseys are "private" as against "public" figures, then I'm Michael Jackson. Lin Wood tried to pull this in the Richard Jeweell, case, arguing that Jewell was a private and not public figure. He lost, big time. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Thanks, NYL" Posted by Cassandra on 09:09:06 3/30/2001 You expressed it beautifully. They could hardly be presumed to be private persons with all the tv interviews, that spectacle of the summoning of handpicked press with passwords (still a stunning study in arrogance, in my opinion) the crockumentaries on two continents, their calling in to tv talk shows to join in discussions not even about their case, to insert themselves and their murdered child into yet another tragedy, their appearances on religious tv several times, writing a book and promoting it in appearances on tv, interviews with tabloids with cookies and hugs ... if they aren't public people by now, what on earth constitutes a public person? Apparently, their stories have changed, and if the taped tv shows and interviews, and police and detective interviews vary in their details, I would think it presents a problem in their defense. Roll the tape!!! One thing that struck me about the legal document was the use of the word "cops". I found it strange that an attorney used such slang in filing a lawsuit. Wouldn't a judge slap him on the wrist for that, NYL? Cassie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Steve" Posted by JR on 10:00:36 3/30/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 10:00:36, 3/30/2001 GO! Steve. There was a detective named Steve The paster he really did peeve He wrote a book Now she is all shook Because she knows she'll get no reprieve. Just thought I would toss that in before someone takes all the "good" lines again. ;-) SBTC (Steve Beats The Criminals) A page out of Greenleefs book. (Sorry for the plagerism G.) Edited for mistake in my lyrics. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Go Steve!" Posted by freebird on 10:11:37 3/30/2001 Thank-you for writing your story. Between you and NYL this case is going to get some much needed attention and hopefully bring Justice for JB and all those bodies under that bus.... I'm willing to sell my beer can collection to donate to your defence. LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Earthangel" Posted by momo on 10:05:44 3/30/2001 Momo and Steve? I don't think his wife would appreciate it but I kind of like our names together like that. :-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Best wishes, Steve." Posted by Twitch on 10:15:49 3/30/2001 The Ramseys seem out to prove that no good deed goes unpunished. Good luck to you and your family. I sure would be interested in hearing how you view certain specifics of the case now. Has your theory of motives and events changed with time and new revelations? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "LOL, Momo" Posted by Edie Pratt on 10:25:25 3/30/2001 I can hear those sweet nothings now, "who's your Momo?" "come to Popo" and "Momomia!" Oh yeah, best to ST, tho I don't think he needs much help or support, this'll be like shooting fish in a barrel:-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Edie " Posted by momo on 10:29:52 3/30/2001 Thanks for giving me the best laughs I've ever had on the internet. LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "Momo Thomas" Posted by Edie Pratt on 10:35:00 3/30/2001 :-) THAT girl! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "Edie" Posted by momo on 11:41:33 3/30/2001 That's me! I can picture the prelude to the show right now. :-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Steve Thomas" Posted by Tricia on 10:52:19 3/30/2001 It is rare to find a true hero these days. Steve Thomas is an inspiration to us all. How many people would go through the hell this man went through, give up a career and still seek justice, at a high personal cost mind you, for someone he never met? Mr. Thomas you have made this world a better place by not being afraid to take a stand against the powers that be. You should never doubt the course you have chosen. Thousands of people silently support and admire you. Like was mentioned before between you and NYL justice will finally come for JonBenet. Edie Pratt, You crack me up. I think I should reveal right now that Edie is really Jay Leno. Really Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Turn It Up Steve!" Posted by RiverRat on 11:33:59 3/30/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 11:33:59, 3/30/2001 Might as well, what's another 65 million at this point! Make the rounds with Lin and let it rip, put the heat on boulder while you're at it, they need a wake-up call. The world is watching. Since everyone has their files out now, wouldn't a good old fashion ARREST come in handy right about now. Plenty of time to get in a conviction before the six year time frame given this case by Lin Wood. BYW, this above average reader thought nothing about the ramseys guilt until they graced CNN with their presence instead of the BPD. Take a poll, Mr. ramsey woodie, better yet, find one in the archives somewhere taken before there were any books out. Just the ramseys media tour. I have a feeling that one of the dynamic duo is tired of covering for the other. They should have silently slank away by now instead of basically re-opening the investigation. What if ST had said that he thought that John had killed JonBenet and wrote the ransom note and that Patsy helped with the cover-up? Just as "libelous" or not? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "that's a good question, RR!" Posted by Edie Pratt on 11:52:29 3/30/2001 would they sue if ST theorized John? Hmmm, let's see...is there a suit pending for Dr Cyril Wecht, MD? His book was a dandy, and most certainly suggested JR was the perp. Oh, damn the luck! Statute of limitations wore off on that, what a pity, tisk tisk. And, where's the libel action against Linda Arndt? Why, she practically said JR did it, didn't she? Says she's never waivered since staring into his abyssmal eyes and praying he didn't read minds, too. Sounded guilty to me! Oh, I guess the sol wore off there, too. Shucks! Oh oh oh! What about Steven Singular? Not exactly a love letter to campus couple #1, was it? He, afterall, said they "loaned" JB out, and that is as rude and defamitory as one can get! That's basically calling JR a pimp:-) Uh, dag burnit! SOL on the sol...guess it's just down to Det Dreamboat and his erroneous theory that Patsy killed her baby. I hope they get a "proper burial" when they meet their waterloo, lol. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "ST & NYL:" Posted by listener on 11:48:37 3/30/2001 Keep on keeping on! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Hey Steve" Posted by starry on 11:53:58 3/30/2001 I'm behind you all the way. You will let us know if we can contribute to a support defense fund, won't you? Would be an honor to be able to help out. You really are a hero. JFJBR huggs, starry [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "Yes Yes" Posted by Tricia on 12:08:18 3/30/2001 I am itchin' to write a check for Steve Thomas' defense fund. It's the only thing I can do. I feel so frustrated and helpless. Does anyone know if there is a defense fund? Thanks Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Edie and all" Posted by momo on 13:32:28 3/30/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 13:32:28, 3/30/2001 The link didn't work so here is the link to the transcript. Otherwise, you can find the page above if you go to the LKL site. http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0005/31/lkl.00.html Edited to remove the bad link. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "How About St. Martin's Press?" Posted by Red on 12:26:06 3/30/2001 1. Wondering if St. Martin's bought nusiance (oops, I mean libel) insurance? 2. Why aren't the other John Doe cops mentioned by name in the suit? 3. I'm behind Steve 100%. 4. Never forget that the Ramsey motto for this whole entire "messiness" is that THE BEST DEFENSE IS A GOOD OFFENSE. 5. Motto #2. When the going gets tough, hire a "life" coach. 5. The Ramseys sure are investing a lot in libel suits. I wonder why they have so little interest in finding the killer on the loose? (It makes my heart go pitty-pat.) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "it doesn't work" Posted by Edie Pratt on 12:20:28 3/30/2001 Momo, but I might have a picture of him around here someplace...oh, there it is! It's a dandy, too Momo, from my bathtub last year. (don't ask!)He is a real kook, soooo funny that bacon came out my nose! He's covered from the waist down, so you can't really see his tatoo with my name on his butt, but trust me, it's one of the finest 'toos I've ever seen:-)Oh, but I don't have a scanner, darn it all. You'll just have to use your imagination, Momo, but thanks for the heads up, lol. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "Edie" Posted by momo on 13:14:42 3/30/2001 You better leave my man alone! Them's fightin' words! :-) I just finished reading the transcript and I suggest that everyone read it again. No wonder the Ramseys are peaved. Steve made mincemeat out of those two. The lawsuit has everything to do with their pride. Off to see some streaming video of Pity Patsy and John John. Thanks, Steve, for giving us hope. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "forget it, Momo" Posted by Edie Pratt on 13:52:28 3/30/2001 he's purdy, and I'm keeping him! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "ok" Posted by Tricia on 13:10:49 3/30/2001 let's us bump this baby UP [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "Steve" Posted by doScubie on 13:39:10 3/30/2001 I hope all this brings the one little thing needed to fry those two creeps. You did the right thing by getting out of all the corruption, but I think you did all you could to arrest the guilty party. Someone like you should only be blessed with good luck. I'm behind you all the way. Go Steve, go! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "Steve" Posted by Nedthan Johns on 14:05:08 3/30/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 14:05:08, 3/30/2001 I am glad to see the Ramsey's are finally owning up to their threat. I hope if you are right Steve you can prove it in court. Whatever it takes to see justice for JonBenet. May the truth be revealed Edited to add: It strikes me as odd that the Ramsey's are taking this suit this far if they were guilty. It seems to me they are pretty certain they are innocent. I think this suit shows they are in this until the end. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 30. "Dear Steve ...." Posted by Mandarin on 14:52:05 3/30/2001 If one individual in the Jonbenet Ramsey case stands out as remarkable, it is unquestionably YOU! So many people bought into their bullsheet, and became almost like groupies or fanatics. You had the courage to face them "mano a mano" as Flee Bailey would say. Your book did nothing to sway me one way or the other about the Rams. In fact, I actually thought you were far too kind in your book. Had you not written that book, I would have been sadly disappointed. The public deserved and expected a book on the Ramsey case that displayed a measure of common sense and logic and you DELIVERED. To me, there appears to be some sort of malice and jealousy, actually on John's part, more than Patsy's. When I read the lawsuit, what comes across to me is that, both the Ramseys clearly have "inside" knowledge (e.g. each one has a pretty good idea what the other one did and did not do) and so this leads me to the conclusion that perhaps you got the story 90% correct and they are going to try and make you pay dearly for not getting 100% on the world famous "Ramsey Whodunnit Test". They have already shown themselves to the world as tabloid prostitutes just last week and have revealed a lot more about themselves than you or anyone could in a book or a lifetime. Their tactics are hypocritical and so transparent and I thank God every day that there was one individual in the Ramsey case who was never fooled by their flaky and superficial aura. They are and always will be the authors of their own destruction. Regards, Mandarin [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 31. "NYL ..." Posted by Mandarin on 15:14:51 3/30/2001 That was a very good read (the Scientology case). You seem to be right on the ball and we're all in your corner. BTW, in the lawsuit they mention John Doe's and a Jane Doe .... Is the Jane Doe, Linda Arndt? And, will the discovery for this suit come before the Wolfe and LHP trials/discovery, etc.? Another question ... at discovery, would Steve Thomas' lawyer/s be able to request any Ramsey documents and say, maybe their computer, telephone records, etc.? You keep us ordinary folks well informed as to the legal aspects and I pray that things work out well for you in these lawsuits. Just be careful - after all, don't forget you're dealing with a very cunning group of people where their every move is calculated and recalculated. If they stooped to the level of the tabs after 4+ years of trashing them, as a tactical move, don't underestimate them in any way. But like the rest of us, I'm certain you're well aware of their deviousness. Sure hope so! The best of Irish Luck to you, my friend. Regards, Mandarin P.S. Will Jake The Snake (aka Hunter) be deposed in any of these suits? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 33. "Go Steve" Posted by South on 15:34:58 3/30/2001 We're with you. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 32. "I think they are whistling" Posted by Cassandra on 15:30:08 3/30/2001 past the graveyard. I can't imagine that they will sit still to be deposed by Steve Thomas. He knows the questions to ask, that's for sure, and I imagine there are at least 100 people out there ready to give him some ideas. How many lawyers can dance on the head of a pin, to go after the Ramseys? They're probably chomping at the bit to get at them! lol Cassie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 35. "Steve" Posted by whitefox on 16:03:05 3/30/2001 You are a true hero in all of this, and I hope you will be able to finally put these two people in their place - in jail. Any lawyers out there that would like to see justice done in this case should contact Steve's lawyers, get a REAL dream team going, and finally bring them down. Hang in there Steve, we applaud you. SBTC - Steve Breaks The Case [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 34. "Cassie" Posted by momo on 15:36:28 3/30/2001 Attorneys all over the country are licking their chops to be a part of this. This is an opportunity of a lifetime. He's probably going to be turning people down left and right. :-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 36. "Momo...&...whitefox" Posted by Cassandra on 16:07:06 3/30/2001 Yes, Steve Thomas has so many supporters out here, and in the legal profession, too. I hope they come forward to help. whitefox: That's the best SBTC yet! Cassie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 37. "Thanks" Posted by whitefox on 16:19:26 3/30/2001 Cassie :) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 38. "Gerry Spence...." Posted by rose on 16:32:52 3/30/2001 Gerry Spence would be my lawyer of choice. He lives in Colo. too. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 39. "Dan Petrocelli" Posted by Edie Pratt on 16:36:59 3/30/2001 gets my vote, Rose. He got very good at dealing with sociopaths, and he lets them do the talking:-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 40. "Petrocelli" Posted by Barbara53 on 17:16:59 3/30/2001 Dan Petrocelli gets my vote too. Gerry Spence is very protective of the Ramseys, at least every panel he has been on, he has defended them. Go Steve! Three cheers from Brooklyn, NY [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 41. "Gerry Spence" Posted by Mini on 18:13:52 3/30/2001 Always wondered how his wife (Imogene?) could stand being married to him. If I had to look at that fringed jacket and black turtleneck, put up with him counting all his points on his fingers, and listen to that s-l-o-w drawl everyday, I'd go nuts. The simple cowboy routine has been way overworked. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]