Justice Watch Support JW "60 Minutes Scam Part Eight" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... 60 Minutes Scam Part Eight, Morgan, 17:57:52, 4/06/2001 Oh please..., Country Girl, 18:06:42, 4/06/2001, (#1) I wish the way to resolve, Morgan, 18:43:53, 4/06/2001, (#2) Much as I would, Watching you, 18:50:06, 4/06/2001, (#3) LOL, Morgan, mary99, 20:38:21, 4/06/2001, (#4) Regarding Fleet White, Scully, 22:13:22, 4/06/2001, (#7) Scully., Holly, 22:26:36, 4/06/2001, (#9) fly., Holly, 21:59:59, 4/06/2001, (#5) PART VIII?!, Lacey, 22:10:21, 4/06/2001, (#6) Link to Press Release, Holly, 22:23:46, 4/06/2001, (#8) defining media ho', Scully, 23:13:21, 4/06/2001, (#10) on reading... , mary99, 04:04:28, 4/07/2001, (#11) Well, I'm here to tell you, Watching you, 04:27:58, 4/07/2001, (#12) ................................................................... "60 Minutes Scam Part Eight" Posted by Morgan on 17:57:52 4/06/2001 Holly went to the movies and asked me to start a new thread at post #70.... [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "Oh please..." Posted by Country Girl on 18:06:42 4/06/2001 CG to herself: back away from the keyboard! LOL! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "I wish the way to resolve" Posted by Morgan on 18:43:53 4/06/2001 this were as simple as a phone call to FW or a phone call to the scam scum. Does anyone think alot of media types haven't tried to reach FW for a comment on Nancy? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Much as I would" Posted by Watching you on 18:50:06 4/06/2001 like to stay and play, some of us have to work tomorrow and there is still time to read tonight, so... tomorrow is another day, a day to rest, a day to work, and a day for WY to come back here and KICK YOUR BUTTS. good night Say good night, Sparky. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "LOL, Morgan" Posted by mary99 on 20:38:21 4/06/2001 Do'ya think FW would do an internet interview with mame to clear up all the misconceptions once and for all? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Regarding Fleet White" Posted by Scully on 22:13:22 4/06/2001 It's clear to me that Mr. White will continue his pattern of refusing to participate in any interviews with the media or return calls from strangers seeking information that is frankly none of their business anyway. He doesn't owe the general public nor any internet forum any explanation for his behavior before or after the murder of JBR. How much respect would we have for him if he were to join internet forums and appear in chat rooms to discuss his role in the case? I would lose all respect for him. I admire the tact and restraint he has exercised from day one avoiding the media whores who have no other interest in White other than to sell his story for major bucks. White has a family to protect and shield from the prying eyes of the media, and I'd be willing to bet he has been stalked on more than one occasion. The Ramseys ruined any sense of stability he and his family had previously enjoyed before the murder of JBR, and if he appears bitter or resentful then who the hell can blame him? The only thing he has been found guilty of thus far is being the unfortunate person who invivted the Ramseys over for X-mas dinner. If the FBI and the BPD are still investigating NK's claims against White then why not wait until they issue a final report on their findings? Otherwise, I have found absolutely nothing....not one fact posted in nearly 400 posts that implicates FW in any inappropriate sexual conduct involving children. I see no need to stretch these threads out any further unless someone is able to expose concrete evidence that implicates White in some type of child abuse. It's clear that no one has been able to expose FW as being a conspirator in a chid porn ring so this discussion is essentially an exercise in futility. It's possible that a handful of posters are privy to incriminating evidence against FW that they are refusing to divulge, but it's wrong to flaunt this info. before the forum with that tiresome *I know someting you don't know*. Keep your information to yourself if you are not willing to share it with the forum because it doesn't make for a very fruitful discussion. One last thing: it is not unusual to draw every kind of kook out of the woodwork when a high-profile murder is in full swing. Maybe NK is one of these kooks but OTOH, maybe not. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Scully." Posted by Holly on 22:26:36 4/06/2001 One could argue that after FW's Letters to the People of CO, White, himself, is somewhat a "media whore". [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "fly." Posted by Holly on 22:01:35 4/06/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 22:01:35, 4/06/2001 Nancy arrived at the end of February 2000. By end of April, the BPD wanted her to return. During that period of time, the forums were sort of awaiting the outcome of the BPD probe. There was not really too much hostility. But by May/June, the lines were drawn. For those who saw the BPD Press release as the end of the temporary credibility Nancy was extended, the gloves were off. But some read the release word for curious word. Let's see - the Ramseys are not in a sex ring and FW didn't murder JB. What's missing here? So by the time of the early 7/00 BBQ, the 60 MINUTES scam was already old news to mame. And the ferocity of posts on at least two forums was distressing. Hey guys. All we kept saying is that we did not think the BPD fully and completley investigated. Did that opinion need to be addressed with such venom by some? And that is why I think, and another forum's poster confirmed, that the posts were of interest to White. I'd say the noisy Nancy bashers may have been manipulated by a poster/s with an agenda to preserve the Patsy did it, BPD take, on the crime. And while that may be the correct take, it also has yet to be prosecuted or even charged. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "PART VIII?!" Posted by Lacey on 22:10:21 4/06/2001 Good God, y'all I'm with you CG LOL Lacey [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Link to Press Release" Posted by Holly on 22:23:46 4/06/2001 http://www.ci.boulder.co.us/comm/pressrelease/RAMSEY/pr000515.html [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "defining media ho'" Posted by Scully on 23:13:21 4/06/2001 To me, a media whore consists of individuals who call themselves "journalists". They consist of relentless screaming heads of TV, the babbling paranoids of squawk radio and the scribblings of lazy print media "columnists". Fleet White composing a few letters to newspapers in Colorado hardly places him in the category of a media whore in my humble opinion. OTOH, the Ramseys are poster children for media whores. They would win a media whore contest hands down beginning with their nationwide interview which aired within a week of their daughters murder. Have you seen White out their granting interviews, appearing on news programs and writing books about his experiences? Nah. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "on reading... " Posted by mary99 on 04:04:28 4/07/2001 Scully said: Otherwise, I have found absolutely nothing....not one fact posted in nearly 400 posts that implicates FW in any inappropriate sexual conduct involving children. After reading 'nearly 400 posts' there is not one fact that implicates FW in any inappropriate sexual conduct involving children? There are many facts here, and imo, they offer the insightful reader quite a bit to ponder. Confucious say: Read with eyes, see with thought. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Well, I'm here to tell you" Posted by Watching you on 04:27:58 4/07/2001 I agree with Scully. What I see here is some of you adding 1 and 1 and coming up with 5. Maybe you have the missing 3, but I don't think so. You might have 2, and then again, maybe not, because I still have not seen what you want me to see in all this. You want the rest of us to take NK's word that she was, um, what? She was sexually abused for 38 years by members of her family and perhaps others? That is the only claim I am sort of sure she has made. I'm not sure of anything, though. It's all hearsay. Mame swears she doesn't talk about this stuff to Holly, Darby, Mary99, Morgan through e-mail. Holly though claims she was told something just recently through e-mail by mame. But, that aside, if mame, who supposedly was the source of this information to begin with through the previously named four, says NK did NOT claim FW men abused her, then where did it come from? Either there is more that we on the forum (we who are being asked to believe that FW is a perverted twisted child molester and part of a sex ring in Boulder) don't know, but the core group does know and isn't telling us, or the conclusions drawn by the core group, do I need to repeat them - that FW is a .... are their interpretations of what they either conceive to be facts (but aren't) or of something they themselves can prove without a shadow of a doubt and aren't telling the rest of us. Now, if you think that was a convoluted run-on sentence, hard to understand, you ought to be the "rest of us," who have been trying to make heads or tails out of this since it all started and are still on square one. You're trying so hard to convince us. Well, then, start treating us like we are the intelligent, thinking adults we are and tell us the rest of the story. It annoys me that you won't tell us everything so we can make up our own minds but get upset with us because we don't share your opinions based on what we know. As far as I know right now, Fleet White is a good and decent man who has done nothing to anyone that could be considered close to a crime, much less child sex abuse. I will continue to stand up for this man who has now been deliberately and intentionally named as being part of a sex ring who sexually abused NK, along with his father. I hope you people can live with that. You very well may have to prove it some day. I'm off this thread for good. I'm sure you'll be happy about that. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] ARCHIVE REMOVE