Justice Watch 
                                  Support JW 

                       "EVIDENCE 4: Pantry Door Open " 

                 [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] 


                              Table of Contents 
                 ................................................................... 
      EVIDENCE 4: Pantry Door Open , Ginja, 14:31:13, 5/05/2001
        Neighbor saw it, Anton, 20:31:58, 5/05/2001, (#1)
          In, karen, 00:10:48, 5/06/2001, (#2)

                 ................................................................... 



   "EVIDENCE 4: Pantry Door Open "
   Posted by Ginja on 14:31:13 5/05/2001
        According to a police report, the butler door was found open by a
        Ramsey friend who arrived shortly after 6am. 

        Very interesting, indeed! How many different cops did Fernie speak to
        about this? Does he change his stories as much as the Ramseys? And
        which "police" is reporting? BPD or Armistead? Perhaps DeMuth or
        Ainsworth? 

        According to at least one other police report, Fernie went to the back
        of the house and looked through the windows, saw the note upside
        down on the floor, but couldn't get into the house. So he walked
        around the house and came in through the front door. When there was
        talk of looking for prints outside, Fernie piped up that it was possible
        any prints in the back were his as he couldn't get in and had to walk
        around to the front. 

        Interesting, indeed! 

                                                            [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] 
                                     [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 


   1. "Neighbor saw it"
   Posted by Anton on 20:31:58 5/05/2001
        Didn't the next-door neighbor who saw the 
        "weird" lights also report seeing that door 
        open but not seeing anybody enter or leave? 
        Also, that's the door nearest to the spiral 
        stairs, isn't it?
                                                    [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] 
                                     [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 


   2. "In"
   Posted by karen on 00:10:48 5/06/2001
        the article it says there is a possible thumbprint on that door. There is
        a print, anyway. It does not reveal whose print it is. Lou Smit thinks it
        might have been the killer pushing open the door. It seems to me a
        thumbprint would be a "smoking gun" if it were an outsider. Fingerprint
        evidence is some of the best evidence the cops could ever hope to
        have. Is this thumbprint not accounted for? If it is then why is Smit
        trying to use it as a clue? How in the world can they not match a
        thumbprint? And why a thumbprint on a GLASS door of all things when
        the perp according to Smit wore light brown gloves all the rest of the
        time in the house? If this intruder were so careful as to wear gloves
        while commiting the crime why would he be so careless when entering
        or exiting through a glass door and leave a print? This makes no sense
        to me and I think Smit is trying to "make the evidence fit his version of
        the crime". Now, where have we heard THAT before? LOL Others in law
        enforcement have been accused of doing that and I see Smit doing
        that also with a lot of his evidence.

                                                    [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] 
                                     [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]