Justice Watch Support JW "#justicewatch Chat Room" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... #justicewatch Chat Room, Chris, 20:55:56, 5/20/2001 I still don't..., Phantom, 21:54:50, 5/20/2001, (#1) Cybersex in the chatroom?, Twitch, 05:58:09, 5/21/2001, (#2) Chris ....., Mee Too, 17:13:47, 5/21/2001, (#3) oh jeezzzzzzz, starry, 17:34:10, 5/21/2001, (#4) For Pedro...., Phantom, 23:55:15, 5/21/2001, (#5) Phantom, pip, 18:08:39, 5/22/2001, (#13) PIP,, Phantom, 20:07:20, 5/22/2001, (#18) Phantom, pip, 20:16:17, 5/22/2001, (#20) Dear pip, Phantom, 20:31:29, 5/22/2001, (#22) I wasn't there, pip, 20:37:01, 5/22/2001, (#24) No I.., Phantom, 20:54:37, 5/22/2001, (#27) Sorry,phantom, pip, 22:04:00, 5/22/2001, (#28) WHATEVER..., Phantom, 23:13:58, 5/22/2001, (#29) Pedro, darby, 07:41:37, 5/22/2001, (#6) darby, fly, 08:40:05, 5/22/2001, (#7) Chris, Shamrockgirl, 08:59:25, 5/22/2001, (#8) Patti,, LurkerXIV, 09:44:49, 5/22/2001, (#9) Yep, it is getting older.., Phantom, 12:03:43, 5/22/2001, (#10) Oh, Phantom, you too?, LurkerXIV, 13:55:44, 5/22/2001, (#11) L14..., Phantom, 15:06:00, 5/22/2001, (#12) Who cares, Ruby, 18:55:45, 5/22/2001, (#16) cybersex, pip, 18:40:13, 5/22/2001, (#15) Pip, Baybb, 20:08:26, 5/22/2001, (#19) BayBB, pip, 20:35:28, 5/22/2001, (#23) Pip, Baybb, 20:42:08, 5/22/2001, (#25) BayBB, pip, 20:46:00, 5/22/2001, (#26) Great idea, fly!, darby, 18:38:00, 5/22/2001, (#14) pip!, darby, 19:04:56, 5/22/2001, (#17) moi?, v_p, 20:24:45, 5/22/2001, (#21) DEAR RUBY, 1000Sparks, 06:15:03, 5/23/2001, (#30) Ruby is, Watching you, 06:40:39, 5/23/2001, (#31) WY, A.K., 06:50:07, 5/23/2001, (#32) LOL, AK, Watching you, 07:06:51, 5/23/2001, (#33) ................................................................... "#justicewatch Chat Room" Posted by Chris on 20:55:56 5/20/2001 Several weeks ago I got several reports that the #justicewatch chat room was being used for a "cybersex meeting place" and/or that discussions held there were not in the best interest of Justice Watch. I was fortunate the Baybb was willing and able to help me password protect it until such time as we could find someone who would help moderate it or we could just open it for scheduled chats or whatever. Tonight I learned that a former JW moderator and forum member has taken over the #justicewatch chat room, claiming it was abandoned. Therefore, I'm issuing the following "warning" to those who have used the room in the past or might think to venture there these days: The Justice Watch chat room is currently under the control of a person or persons not affiliated with the Justice Watch Web site and community. Please refrain from using #justicewatch until further notice (not that very many have been using it). Thanks, Chris [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "I still don't..." Posted by Phantom on 22:18:11 5/20/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 22:18:11, 5/20/2001 .. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "Cybersex in the chatroom?" Posted by Twitch on 05:58:09 5/21/2001 Well now I am confused. Who's having cybersex? What exactly is cybersex? Trust no one. The owls are not what they seem. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Chris ....." Posted by Mee Too on 17:13:47 5/21/2001 Thanks...I don't go to chat....sure is a big topic at CS however...... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "oh jeezzzzzzz" Posted by starry on 17:34:10 5/21/2001 Breeding shows, doesn't it? (glad it wasn't me. LOL!!!) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "For Pedro...." Posted by Phantom on 23:55:15 5/21/2001 I've just seen Annette's big heart in action tonight. Well,I'll just need to find something much more valuable to do with my time instead of irc crap. (Needed to do that anyway.) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Phantom" Posted by pip on 18:08:39 5/22/2001 You're right, Annette does have a big heart. pip [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "PIP," Posted by Phantom on 20:07:20 5/22/2001 That's not the way I meant it. I was being sarcastic dear. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Phantom" Posted by pip on 20:42:11 5/22/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 20:42:11, 5/22/2001 I see. Knowing what a big heart Annette actually has, I never would have imagined someone saying that in a sarcastic manner. Having read a post you deleted the other night, I am thinking the issue is not the beheld but the beholder - just my honest opinion. Edited to take out the word "dear" because it sounds so.....never mind. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "Dear pip" Posted by Phantom on 20:31:29 5/22/2001 >I see. Knowing what a big >heart Annette actually has, I never >would have imagined someone saying that >in a sarcastic manner. Having >read a post you deleted the >other night, I am thinking the >issue is not the beheld but >the beholder - just my honest >opinion, dear. SInce I didn't think my post should be with CHris', it was her thread, and I didn't want to start anything... Why don't you post what I posted because I don't remember what it was Dear. I used to think Annette was nice too, but then I still don't know her except, dear, she endorsed Sarah7 shiting and continuing questions at me for why I was Pedro's friend. I wouldn't join them at bashing him because he had never said or done anything against me, dear, and didn't even want me there to explain to everyone else why I said Sarah was a *****, meaning BITCH, then you, weather you were there that night or not, can stay in whatever heart Annette has or doesn't have,because dear, I really don't give a shit. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "I wasn't there" Posted by pip on 20:37:01 5/22/2001 But I can only assume that we have different opinions about many people. It takes all kinds to make a world. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "No I.." Posted by Phantom on 20:54:37 5/22/2001 didn't think you were there. And since you weren't, you don't know what I'm talking about, do you. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "Sorry,phantom" Posted by pip on 22:04:00 5/22/2001 I thought you were talking about Annette, a good friend of mine with a big heart. You must be talking about some Annette I don't know. Sorry if I misunderstood. pip [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "WHATEVER..." Posted by Phantom on 23:13:58 5/22/2001 .HA! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "Pedro" Posted by darby on 07:41:37 5/22/2001 I've been thinking about this... Concerning "Pedro's Palace": Is it possible that the culprit is not at all who you think but someone who might have a grudge against the people who you think did it? A frame, perhaps? Juat a guess, not an accusation. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "darby" Posted by fly on 08:40:05 5/22/2001 darby - Pedro apparently has been banned from JW. You might want to post your thoughts for him at CS. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Chris" Posted by Shamrockgirl on 09:01:22 5/22/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 09:01:22, 5/22/2001 OMG that is a hoot...cybersex in JW chat on IRC. I had been chatting there for the past few years, at least 3-5 times a week and NEVER, NEVER have I seen any cybersex chit on there. An occasional semi-dirty joke and a bit of "harmless" flirting and some posters exagerating their lives. Whomever told you that was lying big time. As for "best interest of JW" well, some there were not happy with some things at JW and discussed it. It was nothing earth shattering. I don't know what went on in private chats at IRC and other "rooms" but it seems that in some respect you have been told bold outright lies. The cybersex was in the minds of whomever lied to you Chris. I know a Pedro has caused trouble, and others who remain unknown have risen to the bait. I hope that in the future taht there can be another JW chat and that the people who go there can conduct themselves properly. I am sorry for all the people who have been hurt, especially Baybb and Maxi and Snow. They didn't and don't deserve all the crappy things that have been said about them. Private grievences should stay that way, private. As for Pedro, I hope that he calms down and decides that revenge isn't sweet. I don't know or care who started Pedro's Palace but it's gone now. I didn't know he was now banned from JW. It's time to stop all of this NOW. It only hurts the forum and individual people. I don't post much and will continue to "lurk" here and post only when I feel that I have something to say. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Patti," Posted by LurkerXIV on 09:44:49 5/22/2001 I agree with everything you said. The only time we should get angry and retaliate is when someone is obstructing the cause of justice for JonBenet. All these other petty personal vendettas are getting really old. Some folks just need to get a real life. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Yep, it is getting older.." Posted by Phantom on 12:03:43 5/22/2001 but I forgot to add, after all the times I've been to chat, I sure missed out on all the (supposed) cybersex too..... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Oh, Phantom, you too?" Posted by LurkerXIV on 13:55:44 5/22/2001 All I "saw" was some thong-snapping and some risque invitations from sailer. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "L14..." Posted by Phantom on 15:06:00 5/22/2001 Sailor is fairly new, I hadn't really paid much attention to him in the few times I saw him in chat. Also, wasn't ever really sure WHAT he was saying.? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Who cares" Posted by Ruby on 18:55:45 5/22/2001 This is now the blandest JFJBR forum on the planet thanks to the clique that made Chris do hoops..........for what? So you junior high school kids can go to other forums and trash whomever because you have been banned or you don't want to talk about MW...blah...blah...blah yet you praise skydog for no censoring. That is a forum I rarely read because there seemed to be about ten people posting until you have your little tantrums here and then it picks up speed. I used to admire the hell out of ya Wy but not anymore and no Sparky I don't want to here about Jonsey hitting all her children in one felt swoop (old) and VP bring on your ugly sense of humor. Whatever, you have taken over this forum and it has lost it's life. I am so not in Chris' inner circle but feel sorry for her nonetheless. She has provided a home for everyone and what does she get????????? Why don't some of you just stay at Cybersleuths permanently. God knows they could use it and in time the wars would be starting all over again. I know some of you are board with trashing Nedthing and Ellikay so have at. Some of us, whether we lurk or not, are really ONLY interested in JFJBR where ever that may lead. Some of the brightest minds are nowhere to be found here thanks, in part, to some of you. carry on as the clique says.............. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "cybersex" Posted by pip on 18:40:13 5/22/2001 I have to agree that I never saw any overt cybersex going on in open chat, but I would expect that to take place in pm, and I would hope to never know about it. It has been suggested to me that the room was being used during off-hours (i.e. daytime) for these purposes. I would like to comment that the "flirting" and innuendo taking place in #JW often escalated to off-color and sexist humor, which is one of several reasons some of us left. At times it was downright gross, in my opinion. It appeared at times that some female chatters welcomed this kind of "humor" and in fact encouraged it. It didn't speak well of our community, and I think the subsequent exodous was justified. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "Pip" Posted by Baybb on 20:08:26 5/22/2001 And you told me the reason why you liked going to another room was because you thought #JW was boring. You weren't allowed to trash anyone. Sex talk wasn't allowed in #JW and you will have a hard time finding anyone who ever saw any. All that was ever asked of any chatter was that all be polite. You did not want to be polite and wanted an uncontroled room. Now you have it, why keep trying to trash what you left? Why? You have what you said you wanted or do you? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "BayBB" Posted by pip on 20:35:28 5/22/2001 "JW often escalated to off-color and sexist humor". As you know, "sexist" is not "sex talk" "off color" implies innuendo; as I posted above, it wasn't overt. I don't think I'll have a hard time finding others who agree. I won't name the offenders because I feel you know who I'm talking about, and because frankly they had the right to talk that way in a room that allowed it. I just didn't want to be there. As I posted above, "...which is one of several reasons some of us left." I don't remember using the word "boring" but indeed it applies - once a large group of people who I enjoyed chatting with had left, it was boring. I'm not saying you are boring - I find you to be most interesting, and have always enjoyed hearing about your life experiences and wisdom...I missed the majority, however, and a brief stint chatting in both places just didn't work for me. Perhaps I was negligent in saying that there were many positives about #JW , but the topic on this thread seemed to be leaning toward the "cybersex" question, which I duly negated. I'm not trashing the #JW chat - I am commenting that there were problems there, as anywhere. I think that's common knowledge. I feel you did a fine job, BBB, and I am not trashing you personally, just stating my opinion. If by "uncontrolled room" you mean a room that respects free speech while rejecting inappropriate innuendo, you're right. That's what I wanted, and that's what I got. I wish you well. pip [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "Pip" Posted by Baybb on 20:42:08 5/22/2001 Well, it doesn't sound like where you are now is without problems either. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "BayBB" Posted by pip on 20:46:00 5/22/2001 Of course there will be problems wherever human beings go - human nature and all that. Nobody is perfect, so no group is perfect. I like to think we all muddle through, making choices that work for us, coping with problems that inevitably arise. Sometimes we pick up our marbles and move on to a different game. My marbles are still with Justicewatch, but #Justice wasn't for me anymore. It's just that simple. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "Great idea, fly!" Posted by darby on 18:38:00 5/22/2001 I'll just go right ahead and bee-bopp on over to Cybersleuths to post my thoughts for Pedro. I'm sure me and my thoughts would be much appreciated--not just by Pedro but by each and every Cybersleuth. You always come up with the perfect suggestions, fly. Thanks a million!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "pip!" Posted by darby on 19:04:56 5/22/2001 email me darby999@hotmail.com (please) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "moi?" Posted by v_p on 20:24:45 5/22/2001