Justice Watch Discussion Board "5/24 press conference reports" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... 5/24 press conference reports, fly, 10:01:29, 5/24/2000 Lin Wood, momo, 10:12:25, 5/24/2000, (#1) JR & PR..., pybird, 10:15:57, 5/24/2000, (#2) Lin said..., CensusGrrl, 10:18:12, 5/24/2000, (#4) John and Patsy , momo, 10:16:38, 5/24/2000, (#3) I guess, Ribaldone, 10:18:26, 5/24/2000, (#5) Watch it via your computer, Kaethe, 10:19:44, 5/24/2000, (#6) LW , momo, 10:20:47, 5/24/2000, (#7) John and Patsy , momo, 10:23:42, 5/24/2000, (#8) Inconclusive???, sabrina, 10:27:36, 5/24/2000, (#9) They must think, Seeker, 10:34:29, 5/24/2000, (#15) This was not a good idea, Holly, 10:29:12, 5/24/2000, (#10) Why weren't they, Holly, 10:30:40, 5/24/2000, (#12) Gelb is saying, momo, 10:29:16, 5/24/2000, (#11) THEY FLUNKED!, Holly, 10:33:06, 5/24/2000, (#14) Kleve Baxter on, momo, 10:31:23, 5/24/2000, (#13) Ho-Hum..., LurkerXIV, 10:35:38, 5/24/2000, (#18) How simple could the , momo, 10:35:12, 5/24/2000, (#17) Gelb dissed Baxter a little?, CensusGrrl, 10:34:34, 5/24/2000, (#16) miranda rights, stryker, 10:42:20, 5/24/2000, (#28) Reporter asking why FBI , momo, 10:38:10, 5/24/2000, (#23) a little confused, fly, 10:38:07, 5/24/2000, (#22) Fly..., CensusGrrl, 10:40:18, 5/24/2000, (#25) Oh, and this tidbit..., CensusGrrl, 10:37:43, 5/24/2000, (#21) Note that, AutumnBorn, 10:37:29, 5/24/2000, (#20) Lin Wood i whining., Holly, 10:37:20, 5/24/2000, (#19) Lin Wood, AutumnBorn, 10:41:57, 5/24/2000, (#27) They do not trust the BPD , momo, 10:40:51, 5/24/2000, (#26) I love their little, Ribaldone, 10:39:34, 5/24/2000, (#24) thanks, everybody, fly, 10:46:47, 5/24/2000, (#34) certain, stryker, 10:46:04, 5/24/2000, (#32) Ramseys, Lacey, 10:45:57, 5/24/2000, (#31) LW says because MB rushed to judgement, momo, 10:43:26, 5/24/2000, (#29) Gelb , momo, 10:46:12, 5/24/2000, (#33) No urinalysis, AutumnBorn, 10:45:37, 5/24/2000, (#30) Mr. Ev, Ev, 10:52:46, 5/24/2000, (#41) Have they waived attorney/client priv. about all polygraphs?, CommonSense, 10:50:16, 5/24/2000, (#36) LW , momo, 10:48:21, 5/24/2000, (#35) Hey Patsy!, fly, 10:52:12, 5/24/2000, (#39) I am, Ribaldone, 10:50:58, 5/24/2000, (#38) John saying , momo, 10:50:18, 5/24/2000, (#37) The biggest thing, Ribaldone, 10:54:46, 5/24/2000, (#44) LW says , momo, 10:52:50, 5/24/2000, (#42) The drama queen delivers, Holly, 10:52:33, 5/24/2000, (#40) Ah The REAL Rams are emerging. , Holly, 10:58:12, 5/24/2000, (#48) wow!!!!!!!!, dixie, 10:56:30, 5/24/2000, (#46) Oh, all these, Ev, 10:54:46, 5/24/2000, (#45) John says, momo, 10:54:43, 5/24/2000, (#43) LW says , momo, 10:56:58, 5/24/2000, (#47) Patsy, vic, 11:08:44, 5/24/2000, (#61) RIBALDONE...CHANGE CHANNELS, Cassandra, 11:04:14, 5/24/2000, (#57) LW said, momo, 10:58:47, 5/24/2000, (#49) LW said the professionals , momo, 11:02:59, 5/24/2000, (#53) This is getting gooooood, Ribaldone, 11:01:04, 5/24/2000, (#52) oh, dixie, 11:00:53, 5/24/2000, (#51) A reporter just, Holly, 11:00:30, 5/24/2000, (#50) HUH, dixie, 11:04:18, 5/24/2000, (#58) Flol, Starling, 11:03:56, 5/24/2000, (#56) McKinley, Holly, 11:03:11, 5/24/2000, (#55) HELP!!!, earthangel, 11:03:10, 5/24/2000, (#54) Each test took HOURS!, Holly, 11:04:42, 5/24/2000, (#59) Patsy , momo, 11:11:39, 5/24/2000, (#64) Could the reason for taking, AutumnBorn, 11:09:49, 5/24/2000, (#62) Polygraphs Are not admissable in Civil Court, CommonSense, 11:11:45, 5/24/2000, (#65) Oh, thank you Jesus!, Holly, 11:07:33, 5/24/2000, (#60) 3 1/2 years, vic, 11:12:38, 5/24/2000, (#67) This is hysterical!, Ribaldone, 11:11:36, 5/24/2000, (#63) The same geezer..., RiverRat, 11:26:04, 5/24/2000, (#77) FOX NEWS, Ribaldone, 11:12:30, 5/24/2000, (#66) Linda Tripp, momo, 11:13:32, 5/24/2000, (#68) Marilyn Jerritt, momo, 11:23:03, 5/24/2000, (#75) Phone numbers, why_nut, 11:20:53, 5/24/2000, (#71) Why?, Nandee, 11:17:43, 5/24/2000, (#69) Jeralyn Merritt, Ribaldone, 11:20:09, 5/24/2000, (#70) AHHH HAAAAA, Ribaldone, 11:22:14, 5/24/2000, (#74) What happened?, dixie, 11:21:17, 5/24/2000, (#73) new thread is ready, fly, 11:24:25, 5/24/2000, (#76) Chuck Green says he is "impressed", Jeanilou, 11:20:56, 5/24/2000, (#72) ................................................................... "5/24 press conference reports" Posted by fly on 10:02:05 5/24/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 10:02:05, 5/24/2000 OK, everybody. Here's a place to post your reports. Remember that some of us are not able to watch it live, so transcripts/synopses will be appreciated. [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "Lin Wood" Posted by momo on 10:12:25 5/24/2000 is speaking now. Talking about the April 97 interviews. John said in the interview he felt guilty and didn't think he could pass it. ST asked if he would take a polygraph. He would feel insulted. Patsy asked what would it take to get past her. A polygraph. I'll take ten of them. You know whatever. He's now saying that when they interrogated them later they were never asked to take one. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "JR & PR..." Posted by pybird on 10:15:57 5/24/2000 are actually sitting together closerthanthis and smiling for the cameras. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "Lin said..." Posted by CensusGrrl on 10:18:12 5/24/2000 A polygrapher in NJ ran the first test. The results were Inconclusive! He recommended a retest, but told them protocol dictated that he not be the one to run it. So he referred them to Ed Gelb, the biggie in CA. More to come... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "John and Patsy " Posted by momo on 10:16:38 5/24/2000 Ramsey said they would take a polygraph. Results be made public, independent polygrapher, in Atlanta. Lin Wood says they had never taken a polygraph before they said they would take a fair and independent examination. LW retained Jerry Toriello. They took the LD test. Charts were inconclusive.Recommended that they be retested. Someone independent. LW checked out Dr. Edward Gelb. Former president of APA. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "I guess" Posted by Ribaldone on 10:18:26 5/24/2000 second time's a charm! Couldn't pass the first one so just keep going until you do pass it. No drug tests allowed. LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "Watch it via your computer" Posted by Kaethe on 10:19:44 5/24/2000 It's on at MSNBC's website - that's where I'm watching it as we speak. Wanted to make sure everyone knows. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "LW " Posted by momo on 10:20:47 5/24/2000 discussed Geld With J and P. LW called Mark Beckner and told him about Gelb. The BPD rejected. Asked Beckner might learn about Gelb and reconsider. They waited to hear from MB for a week. Retained Kleve Baxter to read the polygraph. John and Patsy made a deal with the public to take an examination. No FBI related examiner. Asked the FBI to make a list of qualified examiners. Never did. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "John and Patsy " Posted by momo on 10:23:42 5/24/2000 Ramsey took test. Dr Gelb is on. Going to read the results. The report reads as follows. Summary report. Examinations were conducted from May6 - May17. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Inconclusive???" Posted by sabrina on 10:27:36 5/24/2000 wow, they admitted their first test was inconclusive????? Thanks so much for posting this, I am looking at it while I am at work. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "They must think" Posted by Seeker on 10:34:29 5/24/2000 we're all so stupid! Do they really expect us to believe they haven't taken several of these tests? Or that they weren't on medication? They refused to take urinalysis to verify they weren't on any drugs, yet they want us all to believe them! How insulting! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "This was not a good idea" Posted by Holly on 10:29:12 5/24/2000 Patsy's first tests were inconclusive. Why aren't they giving the exact number of the numerical conclusion 0-7? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Why weren't they" Posted by Holly on 10:30:40 5/24/2000 asked MORE questions? This is bullshit. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Gelb is saying" Posted by momo on 10:29:16 5/24/2000 that Johns examinations and all of the relevant questions lead him to believe that John was not guilty of murdering JonBenet. He was telling the truth. All questions had no for answers. Patsy's were inconclusive. Did you inflict injuries? That caused her injuries? Blah, blah, blah. Do you know who inflicted the injuries? Do you know who killed her? Did you write the Ransom note? Is that your handwriting on the note? Gelb says that Patsy Ramsey was telling the truth. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "THEY FLUNKED!" Posted by Holly on 10:33:06 5/24/2000 Yep. They took lie detector tests and didn't pass -- inconclusive. For all intents and purposes they cic not pass, they flunked. IMO. they looked for another polygrapher. this time Patsy was again inconclusive, is my take on this. They tried again and she passed. but what was her 0-7 score? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Kleve Baxter on" Posted by momo on 10:31:23 5/24/2000 52 year veteran of the polygraph. Taken hundreds of classes. Patsy is on her high horse. Bit*& [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "Ho-Hum..." Posted by LurkerXIV on 10:35:38 5/24/2000 ...a Big Lie repeated loud enough and often enough becomes..BOOOOOORRRRIIIING!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "How simple could the " Posted by momo on 10:35:12 5/24/2000 questions get? My God. Lin Wood is back up at the podium. LW sent letter to BPD the results of the test. LW giving them the opportunity to meet with Dr. Gelb. Questions from reporters. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Gelb dissed Baxter a little?" Posted by CensusGrrl on 10:34:34 5/24/2000 I'm gonna have to rewatch that section of the tape, but Baxter said he questioned something about Gelb's results. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "miranda rights" Posted by stryker on 10:42:20 5/24/2000 are now a means of intimidation? this from a defense attorney?? i thought miranda was to protect the subject. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "Reporter asking why FBI " Posted by momo on 10:38:10 5/24/2000 could not be involved. LW said he's asked for protocol. FBI intinmidation could last for hours. John and Patsy were entitled to not have the slightest concern of whethter or not the FBI would be fair. MB rejected . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "a little confused" Posted by fly on 10:38:07 5/24/2000 Who administered the 2nd test? Toriello gave the first (inconclusive). Did Gelb administer the 2nd? Somebody posted LW hired L. Baxter to read the test. Is this a second person used to interpret the 2nd test? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "Fly..." Posted by CensusGrrl on 10:40:18 5/24/2000 Toriello gave first test. Results were inconclusive. Gelb gave second test. Gelb's results were checked by Cleve Baxter. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Oh, and this tidbit..." Posted by CensusGrrl on 10:37:43 5/24/2000 Patsy's first set of tests with Gelb were thrown out because of what he called "distortions." Gee, somehow John's tests didn't have those. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Note that" Posted by AutumnBorn on 10:37:29 5/24/2000 the only attorneys present (and there are several) are civil attorneys. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "Lin Wood i whining." Posted by Holly on 10:40:50 5/24/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 10:40:50, 5/24/2000 This is bad for the Garroters. he is trying to suggest the FBI didn't play fair because they wouldn't tell Wood their protocol. What LOSERS. Of course I meant IS whining! He's still whining. This is going to backfire big time. Bottom line -- The rAmseys felt THEIR FBI exam should have been different from everybody elses exam. Creeps. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "Lin Wood" Posted by AutumnBorn on 10:41:57 5/24/2000 is saying that Beckner jumped to conclusions yesterday because he didn't know the results of the test. I thought it was just mentioned that the results were faxed to the BPD and the DAs office. Which is it? Did I hear wrong? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "They do not trust the BPD " Posted by momo on 10:40:51 5/24/2000 or anyone related to the FBI. John saying they don't have to defend themselves(sure have spent alot of money defending yourself)Wants the killer of their daughter found. A killer walks among us. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "I love their little" Posted by Ribaldone on 10:39:34 5/24/2000 ploy about turning off the media mics so you can't hear any of their questions. Talk about one sided -- the only ones we hear are Team Ramsey. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 34. "thanks, everybody" Posted by fly on 10:46:47 5/24/2000 Thanks for the reports. Keep it up. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 32. "certain" Posted by stryker on 10:46:04 5/24/2000 why the use of the word "certain" in: do you know "FOR CERTAIN" who killed jonbenet? certainly leaves a little wiggle room IMO eeeek just confirmed NO drug tests were given [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 31. "Ramseys" Posted by Lacey on 10:45:57 5/24/2000 are looking very bad over all this. Don't they realize? Why are they doing this? (But keep talking, lol) It's almost like they're saying, "We took the tests, they're inconclusive, so what" Going to a new expert a second then a third time makes it so obvious they're shopping around for desired results. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "LW says because MB rushed to judgement" Posted by momo on 10:43:26 5/24/2000 that this is why the BPD is in the boat their in today. Gelb saying inconclusive means no opinion. Gelb saying that 2 separate people both passing is unconscionable. The same 5 tests. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 33. "Gelb " Posted by momo on 10:46:12 5/24/2000 said he did not test for drugs. Did tests that require reactivity. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 30. "No urinalysis" Posted by AutumnBorn on 10:45:37 5/24/2000 by Gelb. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 41. "Mr. Ev" Posted by Ev on 10:52:46 5/24/2000 beat me to the punch in saying, this is soooooo boring! As far as Lin Wood is concerned, "POW ~~~~~~~~ZOOOOOOOOM!!! Right in the kisser." You know, this is just pathetic to see how stupid these people appear. Patsy now rambling about her vows to JB to catch killer. Keep it up, Patsy, you are burying yourself in it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 36. "Have they waived attorney/client priv. about all polygraphs?" Posted by CommonSense on 10:54:23 5/24/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 10:54:23, 5/24/2000 Seems to me that by telling all of this, arguably they have waived the privilege regarding any and all questions about the polygraphs taken - including reports from all reports and questions asked. I assume the NYL will try to get these during the Chris Wolfe suit - interesting. I bet that the criminal attorneys are shaking their heads over this. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 35. "LW " Posted by momo on 10:48:21 5/24/2000 said no one has said that they would not take the test because of the urinalysis. It is an out and outright lie. Patsy is f up on something. Patsy says to ask MB where we go next. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 39. "Hey Patsy!" Posted by fly on 10:52:12 5/24/2000 Where to go next? How about to the nearest FBI office to arrange for them to test you? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 38. "I am" Posted by Ribaldone on 10:50:58 5/24/2000 so pissed that I can't hear the media questions. It sounds like they are asking tough questions because Patsy has had two outbursts so far. She's getting PO'd. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 37. "John saying " Posted by momo on 10:50:18 5/24/2000 they don't want to be public about their investigators. LW saying CW lawsuit is frivolous. Not worth the paper that it is written on. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 44. "The biggest thing" Posted by Ribaldone on 10:54:46 5/24/2000 for me is that according to Ed Gelb, Patsy didn't write the note. That right there tells me the whole thing is bogus. Wayyyy too many other experts in handwriting, psycholinguistics etc. have stated she DID WRITE TEH NOTE. A polygraph taken under those circumstances three years later taken by anyone other than the FBI don't mean squat. They are just as guilty as they were yesterday. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 42. "LW says " Posted by momo on 10:52:50 5/24/2000 it's time the public knows the truth. Patsy said the whole time she was taking the test she had JB's face in her mind saying honey we're going to get through this. (puke) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 40. "The drama queen delivers" Posted by Holly on 10:52:33 5/24/2000 Watch that exasperated look. The body language is exquisite. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 48. "Ah The REAL Rams are emerging. " Posted by Holly on 10:58:12 5/24/2000 John just got snotty. So did Wood. They say Thomas's polygraph test request didn't fly because it wasn't a FORMAL request. it should have been requested via LETTER. Absurd. They are now on the defensive. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 46. "wow!!!!!!!!" Posted by dixie on 10:56:30 5/24/2000 Alright this is geting goood now! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 45. "Oh, all these" Posted by Ev on 10:54:46 5/24/2000 quiet little people who send them letters, and come up and give them hugs. They don't write letters to editors and go on national TV. BUT YOU DO, DON'T YOU? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 43. "John says" Posted by momo on 10:54:43 5/24/2000 they have been overwhelmed by the public response of caring. Patsy says everything they have done for three years has been to further the investigation. John saying they have never tried to prove their innocense. Fruitless. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 47. "LW says " Posted by momo on 10:56:58 5/24/2000 MB waited until April 2000 to ask for the test. Noone has taken a polygraph in the family but J and P [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 61. "Patsy" Posted by vic on 11:08:44 5/24/2000 is such a snotty little bitch. Get on with their lives? No - how ridiculous she says. And John? Prove your innocence so the police can look for the real killer? Silly, he responds. Arrogant fu***ing little liars. They will fold and be shown for what they are when they are on the stand. Get it Alex? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 57. "RIBALDONE...CHANGE CHANNELS" Posted by Cassandra on 11:07:59 5/24/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 11:07:59, 5/24/2000 IT'S ONLY FOX NEWS THAT DOESN'T PICK UP THE QUESTIONS. I CHANGED TO MSNBC AND AM GETTING IT ALL. This is not going well for the Ramseys. And, I just realized she reminds me somewhat of my sister in law! EGAD! I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE DISTORTIONS IN PATSY'S EARLIER POLYGRAPH! TOO BAD THEY DIDN'T ASK ABOUT THE STAGING. MY EXPERT CAN BEAT UP YOUR EXPERT! Cassie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 49. "LW said" Posted by momo on 10:58:47 5/24/2000 he learned 4 years ago not to trust the FBI. Why MB would not enforce the exam. Because he knew John and Patsy would pass and then what would MB say. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 53. "LW said the professionals " Posted by momo on 11:02:59 5/24/2000 of polygraphy have all been endorsed by the FBI. Gelb said that the questions were not easy. CM saying that an FBI polygrapher would have asked specifics about what might have caused the head wound and questions of that sort. John and Patsy got questions at the time the test was conducted. This would have them pay more attention to questions which they might have a less than honest answer to. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 52. "This is getting gooooood" Posted by Ribaldone on 11:01:04 5/24/2000 Sounds like the media's not buying their PR crap! Everyone's getting angry. Temper temper. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 51. "oh" Posted by dixie on 11:00:53 5/24/2000 I sure saw some of that anger they have been hiding. hot coals. . . now thats an idea [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 50. "A reporter just" Posted by Holly on 11:00:30 5/24/2000 suggested the questions were "soft". Now Gelb is trying to explain things and not doing well. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 58. "HUH" Posted by dixie on 11:04:18 5/24/2000 where is all the other evidence we were spose to be enlightened of? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 56. "Flol" Posted by Starling on 11:03:56 5/24/2000 I'll buy the lighter fluid for them there bed of coals.LOL I want to hear from the guy who did the test that was inconclusive. I want to here from Beckner and the FBI. Star [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 55. "McKinley" Posted by Holly on 11:03:11 5/24/2000 just suggested a "better informed" about the case examiner should have been used. hahahahahahahahahaha. Good one, Carol. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 54. "HELP!!!" Posted by earthangel on 11:03:10 5/24/2000 Is there another site that is broadcasting this on real player, I can't get media player? ea [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 59. "Each test took HOURS!" Posted by Holly on 11:04:42 5/24/2000 Just to answer 8 questions. Patsy is explaining the ordeal. Hah! They knew all questions in advance. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 64. "Patsy " Posted by momo on 11:11:39 5/24/2000 looks like she's about to crack up. I don't see anything funny. John saying case has been surrounded by morldwide media attention. That is what affected the case and the professionals in Boulder. LW saying ST only had one homicide under his belt. Gives LS credit. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 62. "Could the reason for taking" Posted by AutumnBorn on 11:09:49 5/24/2000 the polygraphs also be to foil the civil suit filed by NYL? Are polygraphs admissible in civil court? NYL's complaint goes into much detail about Patsy/John involvement in the murder of their daughter. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 65. "Polygraphs Are not admissable in Civil Court" Posted by CommonSense on 11:11:45 5/24/2000 However, the information gleaned from a review of the polygraph might be used. If someone lies under oath about taking a polygraph or the results - maybe that could be used. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 60. "Oh, thank you Jesus!" Posted by Holly on 11:07:33 5/24/2000 The results were considered in an 'ACADEMIC" background. Academic studies. What a Ramsaster. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 67. "3 1/2 years" Posted by vic on 11:12:38 5/24/2000 of their 'investigators' and they still have come up with nothing? Sounds like they're doing a good job. And that wiley killer, wow, he's really gone into deep hiding. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 63. "This is hysterical!" Posted by Ribaldone on 11:11:36 5/24/2000 First Patsy just butts in and completely takes over the forum trying to explain, like a 5 year old, what a polygraph is. What an ass. And who's that old geezer that did the corroborating results. He just can't shut up about himself. He butt in while LW was talking to say he trained the FBI. Now he's yapping about being featured in some upcoming TV show. I think they're trying TOO HARD to get anyone to buy their crap. They're practically begging. PULEEEEZE [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 77. "The same geezer..." Posted by RiverRat on 11:26:04 5/24/2000 whom we have just been informed to trust, TRAINED those bad F.B.I. guys that are not to be trusted? Huh?! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 66. "FOX NEWS" Posted by Ribaldone on 11:12:30 5/24/2000 is going to have experts on to talk about what these results mean. Also will take calls. I'd better being seeing the BDP! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 68. "Linda Tripp" Posted by momo on 11:13:32 5/24/2000 is out of hot water!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 75. "Marilyn Jerritt" Posted by momo on 11:23:03 5/24/2000 is on and saying that the Rams passed with flying colors. She says that the Rams took the test to restart the investigation so that it would be taken serously. Tests were inconclusive which means of no opinion. Drugs and the passage of time do not affect the tests. Inconclusive does not mean deceptive. I guess this means just what I thought. Of no opinion. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 71. "Phone numbers" Posted by why_nut on 11:20:53 5/24/2000 Can anyone provide me with the fax numbers of CNN, Fox News and MSNBC? I wish to fax the JonBenet Foundation tax records to them, so that they may see how little the Foundation has been funded, and to show how nothing has been done, as of 1998, to fulfill the Foundation's purposes. This act would be in response to the question raised at the press conference about the Foundation's activities. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 69. "Why?" Posted by Nandee on 11:17:43 5/24/2000 Why did the Ramsey's wait to take a lie detector test? They were waiting for an engraved invitation BPD! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL Nandee ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 70. "Jeralyn Merritt" Posted by Ribaldone on 11:20:09 5/24/2000 is on FOX. Gag me! Schiller and Chuck Green are on MSNBC. Call Fox at 1-800-FoxNews (What do you think about the Ramsey case?) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 74. "AHHH HAAAAA" Posted by Ribaldone on 11:22:14 5/24/2000 MSNBC just played Patsy's interview with Katie Couric when she said "I understand it's just Voodoo science." The MSNBC interviewer (girl, can't remember her name) said, "so that's what Patsy had to say about polygraphs, so why is it now the subject of a 1.5 hour press conference?" Good one! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 73. "What happened?" Posted by dixie on 11:21:17 5/24/2000 Is the press confrence still going on? just when things were getting hot it stopped. what happened? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 76. "new thread is ready" Posted by fly on 11:24:25 5/24/2000 I've posted a nice, fresh (and faster loading, I hope) #2 thread. Might be a good idea to switch over there pretty soon. Thanks again to all who have provided info. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 72. "Chuck Green says he is "impressed"" Posted by Jeanilou on 11:20:56 5/24/2000 Chuck Green says he is impressed with the public performance of the Ramseys. He says thought Patsy was in control of her emotions and John wass attentive. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]