Justice Watch Discussion Board "It's confirmed" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... It's confirmed, Ruthee, 18:11:05, 5/30/2000 undercover cop, pinker, 18:37:58, 5/30/2000, (#1) Oh no, janphi, 19:03:27, 5/30/2000, (#2) "J", Ruthee, 19:37:47, 5/30/2000, (#3) Ruthee, the media factor, janphi, 21:27:59, 5/30/2000, (#9) IMHO, lee2, 22:48:28, 5/30/2000, (#16) LKL 5/31, ace21214, 19:41:26, 5/30/2000, (#4) Ace, unfortunately, the Ramseys, mother, 19:56:11, 5/30/2000, (#5) Ruthee,, WitchyWoman, 20:15:09, 5/30/2000, (#6) ST's moment, Cher, 21:10:48, 5/30/2000, (#7) Ace, Ryder, 21:23:16, 5/30/2000, (#8) Rams need to prove innocence by, SJ, 21:31:26, 5/30/2000, (#10) Here is a chance!, tall-p, 21:40:37, 5/30/2000, (#11) Pro(zac) Rams, Kelly, 21:49:52, 5/30/2000, (#12) Pro(Zac)Rams, Maude4, 21:56:48, 5/30/2000, (#13) Ram's left Euless for New York, chebrock, 22:43:40, 5/30/2000, (#15) For some reason I thought LKL, lee2, 22:54:04, 5/30/2000, (#17) Steve has truth on his side, Coolteach, 21:58:13, 5/30/2000, (#14) New York, New York, sask, 22:57:59, 5/30/2000, (#18) It'll be interesting just to , fiddler, 22:59:39, 5/30/2000, (#19) Together at last?, GuyGene, 23:18:55, 5/30/2000, (#20) GuyGene, shana, 00:11:07, 5/31/2000, (#21) ................................................................... "It's confirmed" Posted by Ruthee on 18:11:05 5/30/2000 LKL just said Steve Thomas will be on his show with the Ramseys tomorrow night. [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "undercover cop" Posted by pinker on 18:37:58 5/30/2000 Has anyone actually witnessed ST building a house? What a perfect disguise. I hope Beckner has loaded him up with the questions that need answering. I wish that wasn't too good to be true. If you read this Steve at least suggest it to Beckner, what could it hurt? So some little details leak out-atleast the truth will surface and the Ramsey's will be put in their place. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "Oh no" Posted by janphi on 19:03:27 5/30/2000 I'm going to be sick. I don't want this to happen, even though Steve is the one who asked for this and challenged the Rams to it. Pathological liars will have an answer for everything that will sound plausible and make it appear that they have the upper hand, until five minutes after the program is over and someone actually thinks about what they just heard. Oh, woe is me. Don't think this is a good idea. Steve's life doesn't depend on this, the Rams' lives do. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. ""J"" Posted by Ruthee on 19:37:47 5/30/2000 don't underestimate Steve Thomas. Please remember that he has interviewed Patsy Ramsey before. I'm not saying he is will approach her in a confrontational style, I don't think he will. Book or no book, Steve knows things that the Ramseys don't know he knows. All he has to do is hit them with one of those questions and I'll sit there and watch them stutter. I really believe that some people may be mislead by Steve's baby face. He is no dummy. Patsy's problem is that she thinks he is. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Ruthee, the media factor" Posted by janphi on 21:27:59 5/30/2000 I'm not underestimating Steve--I know he can hold his own. But these are the people who called him a "moron" and it went into print in the Denver paper and will be there forever. He doesn't have the same media draw and muscle the Rams do--any misspeak on his part will be repeated and repeated and repeated by the Rams on this seemingly endless spin tour. I still don't like this, not at all. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "IMHO" Posted by lee2 on 22:48:28 5/30/2000 Steve has an excellent vocabulary and I've never once seen him flailing his arms around in an interview. I think he'll do just fine! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "LKL 5/31" Posted by ace21214 on 19:41:26 5/30/2000 I hate to put a damper on this whole thing but tonight on Geraldo there was a statement from Lin Wood (in writing) that Steve Thomas was the definitely the next to be sued. I'm not so sure it's good idea for Steve to face them tomorrow night and tip his hand. Remember - in this law suit Steve is really holding all the cards. They will have to prove that they are innocent in a court of law. I'd love to hear a blistering cross examination but I'd hate to tip them off beofre hand. Any opinions? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "Ace, unfortunately, the Ramseys" Posted by mother on 19:56:11 5/30/2000 don't have to prove themselves innocent in a court of law, the prosecution (if case is ever brought to trial) must prove them guilty. Funny thing - the more they appear on all the tv shows, the more they run their mouths contradicting their previous statements, they'll end up convicting themselves. It'll happen - eventually. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "Ruthee," Posted by WitchyWoman on 20:15:09 5/30/2000 I sure hope you are right. After I thought about the debate for awhile it made me worry. The devil is always working harder to make the truth look like lies. WW [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "ST's moment" Posted by Cher on 21:10:48 5/30/2000 Well, let's remember one thing about Steve Thomas. He was hired to be a media consultant (talking head) in the event of a Ram trial. I can't recall which network it was, but it was one of the major ones. My guess is that he has been professionally trained by the media because he has come off very well to date. In addition, I think he is a natural-born communicator. Combine these two and you have a very strong force. I am thinking that if anyone can handle this, it will be him. Steve Thomas deserves this moment. I am not yet through with his book, but to date it has been one long frustrating encounter with corruption, ineptitude, and evil. I sympathize with him from the bottom of my heart. He wanted to do the right thing; he worked hard to do the right thing, but at every turn the corruption and pure foolishness of the DA's office thwarted him. Wow, Ruthie, I must confess when I first heard about this report of the LKL show, I did not believe it. Thanks for the update. Cher . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Ace" Posted by Ryder on 21:23:16 5/30/2000 Yes, I also was interested in that discussion topic and it was said that if the suit against him goes forth, the onus is on the plaintifs to disprove his claims, and show malice. I'm not sure that at this point the "tipping" of the hand thing is that important. Both sides have already gone very public with what they have to say. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Rams need to prove innocence by" Posted by SJ on 21:31:26 5/30/2000 revealing who the real killer is in order to win their cases. It is the only way that they can prove that what was said about them is a lie, and therefore libel or slander. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Here is a chance!" Posted by tall-p on 21:40:37 5/30/2000 For the Rams to fall to pieces..... go Steve!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Pro(zac) Rams" Posted by Kelly on 21:49:52 5/30/2000 Are you guys telling me that these people are going to be on t.v. twice in one day??? Good grief they were filming in Euless (between Ft Worth and Dallas)today and tomorrow????? Are we sure they are NOT getting paid?? Or, is it a sweeps time and we just didn't know? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Pro(Zac)Rams" Posted by Maude4 on 21:56:48 5/30/2000 It just occured to me, they are probably in Dallas somewhere. Can somebody start calling hotels/motels in the MetroPlex? Bombard NBC with e-mails, call the Dallas NBC affliate or show up with signs:-) [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Ram's left Euless for New York" Posted by chebrock on 22:43:40 5/30/2000 The Ramsey's supposedly left Euless for New York about 8pm 5/30. Does LKL tape from NYC? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "For some reason I thought LKL" Posted by lee2 on 22:54:04 5/30/2000 taped from Los Angeles. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "Steve has truth on his side" Posted by Coolteach on 21:58:13 5/30/2000 and he comes over sympathetically and intelligently. I'm sure I won't be the only one praying for him. He may be a David and they a Goliath...but hey, it only takes one stone. Steve doesn't get his strength to face the day out of a bottle of medications, and he doesn't get his lines scripted by a team of lawyers. Wouldn't you know I'm teaching a class tomorrow night! I'll have to record it. Steve, we wish you strength. Don't be intimidated. I hope you are collecting your smooth stones!! Coolteach [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "New York, New York" Posted by sask on 22:57:59 5/30/2000 I think the Ramsey's are heading to New York to appear on the Today show in the morning. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "It'll be interesting just to " Posted by fiddler on 23:01:14 5/30/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 23:01:14, 5/30/2000 watch the body language of this meeting. Steve Thomas knows the case, he thinks they're guilty, and he loathes both Ramseys--they've NEVER been up against that before. Not on TV, anyway. Want to offer odds on their walking out in a huff before the end of the show? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Together at last?" Posted by GuyGene on 23:18:55 5/30/2000 I have a hard time believing that the R's and ST will be on LKL together. I'll bet they'll be interviewed by LK in separate segments. I've seen other situations on LKL where something is promoted as a "confrontation," but is presented in separate segments. I hope I'm wrong, though. If LK would just shut up and let ST interview the R's, THAT would be a show worth watching. If they're in separate segments, I don't think we'll hear much that's new. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "GuyGene" Posted by shana on 00:11:07 5/31/2000 I'm with you. Just because Rams/ST are both on the bill for LKL tmw night does not mean they will 'debate' or even interact in real time. The program will likely be in segments, as is typical for LKL fare - each side will speak independently. Over the past yrs, LKL has typically presented a guest list that's stacked pro-Ram. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see other guests in tmw night's line-up in addition to the Ramseys and Steve Thomas. I don't expect any major confros (go ahead, Larry - surprise me and change the format of your show). And like I said on the other thread, this tragic case is not up for entertainment or public debate no matter how long the rope - wrong arena. Its resolution, if possible, needs to begin with testimony under oath and not this or any other media display in which the 'suspects' participate, or divert & confuse. Major inconsistencies so far haven't made a whit of diff - why think this supposed 'debate' will change the course? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ]