Justice Watch Discussion Board "Thomas The Absurd" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... Thomas The Absurd, lake, 18:18:58, 6/01/2000 ..a simple thing was needed lake, Nikki, 18:28:37, 6/01/2000, (#1) if it quacks like a duck, it is a duck, nana2, 18:53:17, 6/01/2000, (#6) Just wanted to say , momo, 19:09:32, 6/01/2000, (#7) Lake...., Shamrockpati, 19:14:04, 6/01/2000, (#8) Edited Version, v_p, 19:32:17, 6/01/2000, (#10) ................................................................... "Thomas The Absurd" Posted by lake on 18:18:58 6/01/2000 S. Thomas with his theory of the crime is absurd. Thomas would have people believe that PR killed JBR in a rage over some domestic issue and JR did not have a clue until some time after PR called 911 of 12/26/96. Now that is simple like Thomas is simple, but it is also absurd. And the guy cannot do any better than that. If he could, I assume that he would have taken the opportunity to do better in the "debate" with the Rs on LKL. For Thomas to be anything but a moron, PR would have had to have done the following: 1) Bash JBR in the head with a some object hard enough to fell a 300 pound man. 2) Gather together a device with which to strangle JBR in short enough time so that there would be minimal bleeding into the brain. 3) Sexually molest JBR while she was still alive before the final act of strangulation. 4) Calmly write a 370 + word ransom note in her own hand after the killing and destroy evidence (cleaning the body, disposing of the fabric with which the body was cleaned, disposing of the tape and the cord and wiping the flashlight batteries clean of prints)among other things. Now Thomas makes much of the prior sexual molestion of JBR but makes no effort to tie this in to his theory of the crime. Just another throw away, I suspose. Thomas acknowledges the unidentified DNA under the nails and in the panties of JBR but makes no attempt to tie this to his theory of the crime but states that the DNA COULD be unrelated to the crime without stating what evidence or circumstances cause him to conclude that the DNA COULD be unrelated to the crime. Thomas contends that the fact that PR could not be eliminated as a possible writer of the ransom note, in some way means that she wrote the ransom note. Thomas stresses that the fact that even the Rs handwriting experts conclude that PR cannot be eliminated as a source of the note, but they also concluded that it is highly unlikely that PR wrote the note, means that one should conclude that PR wrote the note. Steve Thomas is a moron. If being a moron were gounds for arrest, there would be probable cause to arrest Steve Thomas. [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "..a simple thing was needed lake" Posted by Nikki on 18:31:27 6/01/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 18:31:27, 6/01/2000 ..and that was a ransom note...an excuse for why the child was hidden away on that wintry night.. ..the note was an act of desperation for there is no motive for this crime that has been firmly pinned down.. ..if Patsy and or John did not actually do the bashing, strangling or molesting then someone else did it and THAT PERSON(S)had a motive.. ..also, they KNOW whom.. ..the Ramsey couple at the least are probably quite guilty of knowledge of her awful death ..but it's a cover your *ss situation for them.. .go figure lake, .they bear no whiteness like lilies.... .Thomas is all right by me...at least he has some good oldfashioned guts..and heart... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "if it quacks like a duck, it is a duck" Posted by nana2 on 18:53:17 6/01/2000 The great jury of American people have come to the conclusion the Ramseys are guilty. Why? because of the way they act. They do not act like heartsick, grieving parents, willing to do whatever it takes to find the killer of their JonBenet. They prefer to have pity parties with whomever will listen to them whine about how unfair the police are to them, never going to the police station, not cooperating, buying opinions..the daughter is dead, long live the queen. what are they hiding? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Just wanted to say " Posted by momo on 19:09:32 6/01/2000 THE RAMSEYS ARE THE KILLAS!!!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Lake...." Posted by Shamrockpati on 19:14:04 6/01/2000 ain't nuttin but a itty bitty puddle....... Yawn......BORING Lake......simply BORING....LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Edited Version" Posted by v_p on 19:32:17 6/01/2000 The Ramseys with their theory of the crime is absurd. The Ramseys would have people believe that an intruder killed JBR due to his/HER jealousy of JR and they did not have a clue until some time after 5:30 a.m on12/26/96. Now that is self-serving and conceited like the Ramseys are self-serving and conceited, but it is also absurd. And these two cannot do any better than that. If they could, I assume that they would have taken the opportunity to do better in the "debate" with Mr. Thomas on LKL. For Thomas is anything but a moron, and he knows that PR had to have done the following: >1) Bash JBR in the head >with a some object hard enough >to fell a 300 pound man. *(just as the stench of her clothes would fell a 300 lb man) > >2) Gather together a device with >which to strangle JBR in short >enough time so that there would >be minimal bleeding into the brain. > >3) Sexually molest JBR while she >was still alive before the final >act of strangulation. >4) Calmly write a 370 + word >ransom note in her own hand >after the killing and destroy evidence >(cleaning the body, disposing of the >fabric with which the body was >cleaned, disposing of the tape and >the cord and wiping the flashlight >batteries clean of prints)among other things. Now the Ramseys make little of the prior sexual molestion of JBR but insist the "perp" is a pedophile in an effort to tie this in to their theory of the crime. Just another throw away, I suspose. (I s u s p o s e ) Thomas acknowledges the unidentified DNA under the nails and in the panties of JBR but makes no attempt to tie this to his theory of the crime but states that the DNA COULD be unrelated to the crime without stating what evidence or circumstances cause him to conclude that the DNA COULD be unrelated to the crime. (kewl) Thomas contends that the fact that PR could not be eliminated as a possible writer of the ransom note, in some way means that she wrote the ransom note. Thomas stresses that the fact that even the Rs handwriting experts conclude that PR cannot be eliminated as a source of the note, but they also concluded that it is highly unlikely that PR wrote the note, means that one should conclude that PR wrote the note. ($$$$$$) The Ramseys are morons. If being a moron were g(r)ounds for arrest, there would have been overwhelming probable cause to arrest both of them. ~o~ V. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] ARCHIVE REMOVE