Justice Watch Discussion Board "Pictures of Stun Gun Marks" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... Pictures of Stun Gun Marks, Harmony, 09:44:59, 8/16/2000 What the heck is this?, Watching you, 09:46:40, 8/16/2000, (#1) They look like, Florida, 09:57:00, 8/16/2000, (#2) what is the origin of the stun gun marks, summerhill, 10:22:38, 8/16/2000, (#4) Harmony,, LurkerXIV, 13:57:43, 8/16/2000, (#14) Huh??, Ayeka, 10:19:13, 8/16/2000, (#3) wait a minute, Edie Pratt, 10:32:57, 8/16/2000, (#5) From personal experience, Seeker, 10:46:51, 8/16/2000, (#6) Clarification, Harmony, 11:59:25, 8/16/2000, (#7) LOUD!!!, La Contessa, 09:03:22, 8/17/2000, (#36) Lunar Vision, Lacey, 12:07:06, 8/16/2000, (#8) Harmony, fly, 13:10:08, 8/16/2000, (#10) Fly, Seeker, 13:27:36, 8/16/2000, (#12) Seeker, Nandee, 16:24:55, 8/16/2000, (#19) Revised Edition, Harmony, 13:05:36, 8/16/2000, (#9) Would she?, Lacey, 13:39:48, 8/16/2000, (#13) indentations?, fly, 13:13:53, 8/16/2000, (#11) Lacey, Fly, Harmony, 14:04:56, 8/16/2000, (#15) Harmony, Cutter, 16:01:37, 8/16/2000, (#18) looking again, fly, 15:51:52, 8/16/2000, (#17) Could they be, momo, 15:47:25, 8/16/2000, (#16) Nandee, Seeker, 16:40:08, 8/16/2000, (#20) Yes I agree, Starling, 17:42:17, 8/16/2000, (#21) My brave husband, Tricia, 18:16:45, 8/16/2000, (#23) LOL Starling..., Country Girl, 18:14:38, 8/16/2000, (#22) Tricia, Seeker, 18:23:24, 8/16/2000, (#24) more Dixie, Nandee, 18:51:16, 8/16/2000, (#25) Thanks Seeker & Nandee, Tricia, 19:02:23, 8/16/2000, (#26) Remember awhile back, ayelean, 19:30:27, 8/16/2000, (#27) Is this for real??, freebird, 20:17:13, 8/16/2000, (#28) While the prosecution team and BPD, Holly, 21:45:02, 8/16/2000, (#29) Ayelean, dawn, 23:02:33, 8/16/2000, (#30) Holly, Tricia, 23:03:18, 8/16/2000, (#31) I don't think JBR is resting, pinker, 07:13:48, 8/17/2000, (#32) I thought Ruthee had put this issue to rest., Twitch, 08:02:13, 8/17/2000, (#33) Well. I still, Watching you, 08:32:32, 8/17/2000, (#34) Hummmm!!, shadow, 08:52:24, 8/17/2000, (#35) Ha-ha, shadow!, LurkerXIV, 09:20:59, 8/17/2000, (#37) Ayelean, Seeker, 09:27:51, 8/17/2000, (#38) Seeker, fly, 09:34:41, 8/17/2000, (#39) Fly, Seeker, 09:39:34, 8/17/2000, (#40) ................................................................... "Pictures of Stun Gun Marks" Posted by Harmony on 09:44:59 8/16/2000 http://www.geocities.com/huni_b/Dixie/Dixiespics.html I only put the close-ups here. As you can see, the marks, which do exist, are round. The picture with the red marks has been inverted to show that there are indeed indentations. It is a negative of the pic with the blue circles. When you invert it, the light spots would be a "hole" in the skin. If you'll look at the surrounding pox marks, you'll figure it out...lol... Please share the URL. I wasn't going to post these, but, (there's that qualifier) since not many actually saw the pictures, I thought I'd help put an end to the round vs rectangular debate. [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "What the heck is this?" Posted by Watching you on 09:47:49 8/16/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 09:47:49, 8/16/2000 Looks like craters on the moon. Is this skin magnified a zillion times? Why would that be necessary to show marks on skin. I don't get it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "They look like" Posted by Florida on 09:57:00 8/16/2000 the pox on Dixie's house to me!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "what is the origin of the stun gun marks" Posted by summerhill on 10:22:38 8/16/2000 Does anyone know if the use of a stun gun has been either definitively affirmed or denied? I had heard that the stun gun was Ramsey "spin" promoted by Lou Smit. However, it also seems that it could be true. The picture of JBR in the red and white dress at the Charlevoix house shows dual marks on her legs similar to stun gun marks. Also, the morning after the murder, JR had a small wound on his left cheek. Could that have been a fingernail scratch from a struggling JBR who, at the moment where she gouged her assaultive father, was "calmed" by PR's zapping her with a stun gun? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "Harmony," Posted by LurkerXIV on 13:57:43 8/16/2000 Are you sure that's not an MRI of Dixie's brain? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Huh??" Posted by Ayeka on 10:19:13 8/16/2000 This could be just about anything (moon craters, har har). If you do have 'farther back' pictures, I suggest you put them up, since these 'detail' is useless as it is. Ayeka [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "wait a minute" Posted by Edie Pratt on 10:32:57 8/16/2000 are those the same pics from the ones they used in the Diane Sawyer interview with Beuf and Bynum? If so, they mentioned, very quickly, that those "stungun marks" were artist's renditions of stungun marks, that they were NOT on JB. Forgetta about it, she wasn't stungunned. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "From personal experience" Posted by Seeker on 11:28:33 8/16/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 11:28:33, 8/16/2000 I can tell you all that stun guns BURN you, they do not leave little scrapes as in abrasions. They are just like having a cigarrette burn, they go DEEPLY into your skin. Yes, the marks they leave are round. Any type of stun gun must make direct contact with the body in order to release it's electrical charge. That includes the air taser. Edited to add: these are pictures of Dixie's child! The one she claims was "accidentaly" zapped by a neighbor child? Then she immediately took pictures and posted them! That woman is SICK for doing that! Then she didn't even take her Down's Syndrome child to the ER? Unbelievable! An accident is an accident, but what why the hell was another child able to get their hands on a potentially lethal weapon in a, supposedly, physician's house? Something doesn't track with her story. Note: even jams banned her, now that's saying something! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Clarification" Posted by Harmony on 11:59:25 8/16/2000 I apologize for the ambiguity of my first post. Here is a brief synopsis: A few weeks ago, a certain poster at another forum was trying desperately to convince another poster that a stun gun was used on JonBenet. The debate continued for a couple of weeks, with each side expounding on their original stance, each throwing case studies and experimental documentation at one another at an increasing pace. One poster felt a stun gun, one with squar prongs, would indeed leave squarish/rectangular marks like those noted on JonBenet's autopsy. The other poster insisted stun gun marks would be round, not square, nor rectangular, regardless of the shape of the stun gun's prongs. The argument was dropped for a few days, then, suddenly, the poster who felt marks would be rectangular, blazes into the forum with a story about her daughter being stunned by a neighbor boy, with his dad's stun gun. She posted pictures of the marks the stun gun supposedly left. Not suprisingly, she claimed one of the marks was rectangular. The pictures were pulled offline, almost immediately. Now, some people are saying that stun guns DO leave rectangular marks. I am just showing that in fact, the marks on the child are round. Some don't believed the child was stunned at all. For those people, please look at the pictures. Those are actual indentations in her skin. It isn't paint or digital manipulation, not that I could tell. The 3 pics are an enhanced version of one of the pictures that the poster posted of her child. The other picture showed the child bent over (she was stunned on the hip) and unclothed. I really couldn't tell what it was (I didn't think it was the child's rear-end ~ but apparently it is) until I read a certain forum moderator's post on the subject. The moderator kept saying the pictures were not pornographic because there was no "crack". She kept saying, "No crack, no crack..." and then it hit me! The 'crack' had been erased. So, that leaves me with a whole new set of questions. If the person who captured and erased a portion of the picture, what else are they capable of doing? This much I know....whoever touched up the photo didn't know even to deinterlace a video shot, so they can't be all that savvy. I hope I cleared up the confusion. If there is a doctor in the house, maybe you could explain something to me. If our pores are round, our follicles are round, and our blood cells round(ish), how could any injury leave a rectangular mark? Even if the prongs are square, when white cells rush to the damaged area, the cells surround the area, in a circular fashion, is that right? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 36. "LOUD!!!" Posted by La Contessa on 09:03:22 8/17/2000 The marks on JBR's body that ONLY Lou Smit said came from a stun gun, could, because of the spacing, between, ONLY have come from an Air Taser. Air Tasers sound like firecrackers mating with lawn mowers. The noise they make is LOUD! Blitzkrieg LOUD! No way John and Patsy, and especially Burke, wouldn't have awakened if an Air Taser was activated in their house. Hell, the whole neighborhood might have heard it. A stun gun was NOT used on that child. If it was REALLY a possibility, the Rams would have had JBR's body exhumed in a hot second to prove their innocence. The Ramseys embracing the stun gun theory is spin. Spinning stun guns? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Lunar Vision" Posted by Lacey on 12:07:06 8/16/2000 LOL, WY, I'm with YOU on this one!! 'Til now I ignored this issue, but I just hadda comment this time. I think it's bogus. Consider the source for chrissakes. Harmony's explanation says it all: this was done for dramatic effect by an agitated poster desperate to win an argument. What fortunate timing, to say the least, that her poor daughter was stunned whilst her mom was debating just such an issue on an Internet forum. Don't think so Gimme a break.................. Lacey Stunned . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Harmony" Posted by fly on 13:10:08 8/16/2000 Not claiming medical knowledge about this, only common sense, but I agree that it wouldn't seem reasonable for a stun gun to create anything but a round, or at most, oval shaped welt. Here's my thinking: I've never seen a stun gun, but I'll bet that the contacts are pretty small, whether round, square, or whatever. From the looks of the pictures and the descriptions I've read online about stun gun effects, they apparently raise a welt, right? That welt is swollen skin, and I seriously doubt that a small square area, when swollen, would look square. It would "melt" to more of a circle. A rectangle, unless very elongated, would produce an oval-like welt. If the contacts were really, really big, my idea wouldn't apply as well, but that's not the case with stun guns. Make sense? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Fly" Posted by Seeker on 13:27:36 8/16/2000 see my post above. Yes, they leave welts. Initially there is a jolt to the body, then the paralyzation sensation, even though you are completely concious you cannot move. It disrupts the electrical body current and renders it usless. It's a very weird sensation. At first (after the initial shock) you can't feel anything, then as sensation slowly returns (like you're entire body has been asleep, because it has) you get that pins & needles feeling all over. The spot where the stun gun was placed burns like hell. It can, and usually does, leave scars. Sometimes they are superficial, sometimes they're not. Mine are on my arm by my right elbow, they are white now and not much bigger than an 8th of an inch. These marks are over 20 years old now, and I still remember the incident well. It was truely an accident. My brother was showing his friend how it worked and I was next to him "practicing my Italion" (waving my arm in a gesture) and got zapped. I'll never forget it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "Seeker" Posted by Nandee on 16:24:55 8/16/2000 Someone on another board said stun gums make a very loud noise. Loud enough that anyone in the house would have heard it? Since you have up close and personal experience, would you agree? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Revised Edition" Posted by Harmony on 13:05:36 8/16/2000 Ok, I put up the original color photo as it appeared online. The one beneath that is deinterlaced, with the contrast and brightness turned up. The third color one is all of the above, plus sharpened, and deinterlaced again. Those may not be stun gun marks, but they are indentations. Lacey, if she were going to fake this, she could've done a better job at proving her point by making the marks retangular, no? The marks are circular, though, which disproves the point she was trying so desperately to make. ???? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Would she?" Posted by Lacey on 13:39:48 8/16/2000 Oh. Je regrette. That makes much more sense. I'm sorry, Harm, but this one's sending my bullshit detector into cardiac arrest. Period. But please carry on. I will refrain from further comment. Lacey . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "indentations?" Posted by fly on 13:13:53 8/16/2000 A stun gun makes an indentation? I thought it caused a raised welt, if anything? Boy, am I confused Briefly poke a pencil into your arm and see how long the indentation remains. Maybe I've just got especially resilient skin, but mine don't last 10 seconds, much less the 10 minutes or so I thought elapsed between the kid being stunned and the picture being taken. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Lacey, Fly" Posted by Harmony on 14:04:56 8/16/2000 Lacey, my BS detector is in full tilt, but not for the same reason. Comment on.... Fly, yes, you are right. From what I've read the gun raises a welt, I think I saw it referred to as a wheal. How soon after a stunning would a welt appear? Would the mark first be indented, only to swell up later? On JonBenet's autopsy, the mystery marks are called "abrasions" which I would not classify as either a welt or an indentation. So, are those really stun gun marks? I don't know. Maybe they are conveniently spaced chicken-pox scars. heh [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "Harmony" Posted by Cutter on 16:01:37 8/16/2000 Nice job on the enhanced photo presentation. I do disagree with you about them looking like indentations, to me they appear raised (as opposed to the pock marks which are definite indentations). In fact, they really look to me like a couple of conveniently located bug bites However, having read several other posts by the psycho who took these supposed "stun gun" photos, I don't put anything past her. Beyond attempting to pass off a couple zits as a stun gun wound, that would also include jolting her own kid to prove a point if that is really what she did. Fortunately another person who saw those photos called the police and reported it as possible child endangerment. The matter was investigated by the local authorities. Good riddance to another internet troll.... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "looking again" Posted by fly on 15:52:21 8/16/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 15:52:21, 8/16/2000 I just looked at the pictures again. The marks indicated as the stun gun marks look raised, not depressed to me. The smaller, more numerous marks are depressions, or craters as Lacey (?) so aptly put it, but the others look raised, as a stun gun mark probably could. Like others have posted, I don't see how an abrasion signifies a stun gun mark, in any case. I haven't been zapped with a stun gun, but I have been zapped with electric shock using an electrode and much lower voltages than a stun gun, and what that produced was more like a burn similar to what Seeker described. And no, it wasn't shock therapy, nor am I into S&M. It was an experiment involving pain tolerance I took part in as a freshman taking a psychology course. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Could they be" Posted by momo on 15:47:25 8/16/2000 the last two brain cells that Dixie has? I think so. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Nandee" Posted by Seeker on 16:40:08 8/16/2000 the one my brother had wasn't that loud. It was the type that the electrodes pointed out and electrical current passed between them. Hard to describe the sound, but think of a coffee pot going on the fritz, zapping noise (not to loud, that zzzzzt! noise) and that ozone type smell. Different models make different sounds. Air tasers are very loud compared to the one my brother had. example: my 94 Winchester trapper is louder than my 22 rifle, but my 357 is about the same as my Winchester in volume. My old M-16 (when I was in the military) made more of a popping noise, where my other 2 rifles are more like a sharp, loud, bang-whoosh than a pop. Different makes and models, different sounds, with similarities. I know this doesn't help much, but it's the best I can do. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Yes I agree" Posted by Starling on 17:42:17 8/16/2000 If you look real closely guys, I think that's Neil Armstrong standing next to crater #4 :-) Star [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "My brave husband" Posted by Tricia on 18:16:45 8/16/2000 let me test my stun gun on him in 1985. It was very loud! It left two little red welts and then they went away! We don't normally do these types of things. We don't get into weird stuff like that. Well maybe Saturday nights after a bottle of wine, but that's for another forum. (lol). Let's face it. No stun gun. No intruder. Just John and Patsy. If I may add something on another note. Lacy, I love your posts. You crack me up. This forum is really incredible. Smart, funny caring people. And finally who the heck is Dixie? My email address is tgrif@xmission.com in case anyone would like to enlighten me. I would appreciate it. Take care Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ EMAIL Tricia ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "LOL Starling..." Posted by Country Girl on 18:14:38 8/16/2000 One giant zap for man ... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "Tricia" Posted by Seeker on 18:23:24 8/16/2000 she was a poster at that other forum that jameson runs. She made claims that apparently weren't true and they found her out. Seems she may be a bit looney. :) Don't know, but that's the impression I got reading some of her posts. Just lurking, jams charges to post, now is that ethical? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "more Dixie" Posted by Nandee on 18:51:16 8/16/2000 ...And, Dixie thinks that posters that disagree with her are full of "tripe and dribble"!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "Thanks Seeker & Nandee" Posted by Tricia on 19:02:23 8/16/2000 I kinda got the impression she might be one order of fries short of a happy meal! So jams charges to post. What's next The Ram's charging us to ask them questions? Oh wait been there done that with O.J. Take Care Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "Remember awhile back" Posted by ayelean on 19:38:12 8/16/2000 NOTE: This message was last edited 19:38:12, 8/16/2000 when the Rams has a ghost writer for their DOI and a poster here was blown away because she had had a prior experience with that so called man of the cloth? Well that's how I am feeling re Dixie! I am bursting with some info but hesitate to post it on a thread that the public can read. It isn't bad info, just a very wierd coincidence. It does look like she is off the deep end now. The strangest thing is, about a month ago another poster here seemed to ring a bell with me and I thought of Dixie, but it was just one of those things like when someone keeps popping in your head and then bang out of nowhere there is that person. Well the same thing happened, so when Dixie surfaced it was as if I willed her to the place. And it gets wierder because she is PRO-RAM! It's one thing to know a person then find out they are gullible enough to be pro-Ram. Edited to add that last paragraph. LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "Is this for real??" Posted by freebird on 20:17:13 8/16/2000 Sorry but those pics look to me like a chicken or turkey before it's cooked,even the yellow coloring in spots... Is this the whole pics we are seeing or was there more that looks human? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "While the prosecution team and BPD" Posted by Holly on 21:45:02 8/16/2000 are in Atlanta, why not exhume what's left of the poor kid and put this matter to rest? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 30. "Ayelean" Posted by dawn on 23:02:33 8/16/2000 You think you know Dixie?????? This is too cool. You must share. What is she like? How do you know her? Why do you think the woman you know and this Dixie are the same person? Does she really live next door to a cop on one side and a doctor on the other? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 31. "Holly" Posted by Tricia on 23:03:18 8/16/2000 During one of the round of interviews John and Patsy gave last spring John was asked "If exhuming your daughters body would help solve her murder why not do it" John replied "No she has been put to rest. Let her rest". I have paraphrased a bit but it was close to that. Now I ask you, if your daughter was murdered and exhuming her body would help the case wouldn't you do it? As soon as possible? I can't even fathom why a father wouldn't want to do whatever it takes to find his daughter's murderer. UNLESS.....hmmmm It was either the Walters or The Today Show interview. As always please excuse my spelling. Take Care Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 32. "I don't think JBR is resting" Posted by pinker on 07:13:48 8/17/2000 peacefully. With so many questions regarding her premature demise her spirit is naturally uncomfortable. Maybe Atlanta was agreed upon because exhumation, or just the inference of it, would clear somethings up, speed them up, or at least cause the Ramsey's to come clean. You now how concerned the parents are with a proper burial and hopefully eternal peace. Here we go again with the pictures FW took the night previous. Are those innocent little scars visable? Along with disputing the clothing she last wore and which hairstyle, that film is priceless. I wouldn't put it past Patsy to have had small marks airbrushed out of professional shots. Maybe original negatives are in evidence with close up proof those marks are unrelated to the murder. Where was the brotherly smack from the golf club located? Check some of the recent photos of JBR close up and look for the 'stun gun marks' or more appropriately simple evidence of an ordinairy childhood, complete with scrapes and bruises. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 33. "I thought Ruthee had put this issue to rest." Posted by Twitch on 08:02:13 8/17/2000 I like her theory that the weaving loom caused the marks. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 34. "Well. I still" Posted by Watching you on 08:32:32 8/17/2000 don't get it. These pictures look as if they were taken under a microscope - skin magnified several times. Why would it be necessary to magnify a stun gun wound to begin with? Why not just take a photo of the normal skin with stun gun marks? When someone has to go to the extreme of magnifying a picture to prove something is there, I have to question what it is that really is there. Stun gun wounds would show up very well without magnifying the pictures. Also, by vitue of the injury - that is electrical prongs or whatever one wish to call them - there would be burns at the site of the injury, I think - not raised (haha, looks like nipples to me) whatevertheyares. MO [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 35. "Hummmm!!" Posted by shadow on 08:52:24 8/17/2000 "...until I read a certain forum moderator's post on the subject. The moderator kept saying the pictures were not pornographic because there was no "crack". She kept saying, "No crack, no crack..." and then it hit me! The 'crack' had been erased." In other words, we were "mooned" and didn't even know it!!! lol shadow [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 37. "Ha-ha, shadow!" Posted by LurkerXIV on 09:20:59 8/17/2000 Glad you found your way back to JW. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 38. "Ayelean" Posted by Seeker on 09:27:51 8/17/2000 didn't Dixie used to post here at JW? I seem to remember that she did... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 39. "Seeker" Posted by fly on 09:34:41 8/17/2000 We've had a Trixie recently. Unless she was posted with another personality, I doubt we had her here. Can't believe she wouldn't have broadcast her biochemistry of digestion expert, saver of the retarded, etc. biography if she had been here. Anybody interested in her real name probably could find it at ACandyRose forum, CS, or murphy's Websleuths. I think it might be gone from jameson's. All of these forums (except maybe ACR, unless it's the Delphi one listed) are accessible via Ken Polzin's site. Or, do a net search for Dixie, Down's Syndrome, and nutrition, and you'll probably find it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 40. "Fly" Posted by Seeker on 09:39:34 8/17/2000 I bet Chris could tell us. I'm sure I saw her posting here awhile back, as Dixie! Before, or at the same time she was posting at jams. I know that I'm not confusing Trixie with Dixie either. Chris, is my memory totally faulty, or can you still access the older archives and let us know? I'm really curious now... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] ARCHIVE REMOVE