Justice Watch "IMUS mentions jameson..." [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... IMUS mentions jameson..., LurkerXIV, 09:55:25, 8/20/2001 email IMUS c/o John, LurkerXIV, 10:05:58, 8/20/2001, (#1) Geraldo..., shadow, 13:13:24, 8/20/2001, (#2) Since Imus wants to know who jameson is..., LurkerXIV, 18:52:23, 8/20/2001, (#3) Lurker, austingirl, 19:14:36, 8/20/2001, (#4) Lurker..., Show Me, 19:44:23, 8/20/2001, (#7) (c) Lurker, JR, 19:31:04, 8/20/2001, (#5) I'm so bad, I'm good!, LurkerXIV, 19:32:25, 8/20/2001, (#6) Where's Cutter's Picture?, Sabrina, 20:53:50, 8/20/2001, (#8) Ellique comments, Ellique, 08:23:27, 8/21/2001, (#9) Hello, doScubie, 09:24:23, 8/21/2001, (#10) Scrutiny, Ayeka, 09:45:43, 8/21/2001, (#12) Discovery mentions Ram-knots, Greenleaf, 09:40:30, 8/21/2001, (#11) popular opinion, Ellique, austingirl, 15:47:54, 8/21/2001, (#13) my informal surveys, Bets, 16:44:33, 8/21/2001, (#14) Bets, Ellique, 17:00:45, 8/21/2001, (#15) Ellique, Bets, 17:16:16, 8/21/2001, (#17) Thanks GL, Gemini, 17:15:05, 8/21/2001, (#16) Bets I don't have to know you, Ellique, 17:59:43, 8/21/2001, (#19) I don't , Florida, 17:47:40, 8/21/2001, (#18) Ellique, austingirl, 18:27:11, 8/21/2001, (#21) 81% says Rams are Guilty, LurkerXIV, 18:19:07, 8/21/2001, (#20) Lurker, austingirl, 18:34:40, 8/21/2001, (#23) Greenleaf, this just in, austingirl, 18:33:33, 8/21/2001, (#22) Ellique, driver, 19:20:19, 8/21/2001, (#24) Bets is right...., Sabrina, 19:48:36, 8/21/2001, (#26) (c) Driver...Heh, JR, 19:45:07, 8/21/2001, (#25) Keep posting while I enjoy it., Ellique, 20:13:58, 8/21/2001, (#28) I would love to know one person in , ayelean, 20:11:11, 8/21/2001, (#27) Ellique, austingirl, 20:18:19, 8/21/2001, (#29) Ellique, momo, 20:21:51, 8/21/2001, (#30) Momo and Austin girl, Ellique, 20:56:26, 8/21/2001, (#31) (c) Ellique, JR, 20:59:24, 8/21/2001, (#32) (c) Class Act and Lawyers too, JR, 22:44:12, 8/21/2001, (#33) Ellique, pinker, 03:30:06, 8/22/2001, (#34) Imus right now, RiverRat, 04:25:31, 8/22/2001, (#35) Ellique, momo, 07:32:53, 8/22/2001, (#36) Ellique, Sabrina, 07:51:00, 8/22/2001, (#37) Never ever exclude anyone, Ellique, 08:53:16, 8/22/2001, (#40) Ellique, Jerrya, 08:29:22, 8/22/2001, (#38) jerrya..., LurkerXIV, 08:52:52, 8/22/2001, (#39) If you only loved me half as much as I do., Ellique, 08:58:05, 8/22/2001, (#41) Ellique, austingirl, 18:52:06, 8/22/2001, (#42) Oh, austingirl,, LurkerXIV, 19:01:46, 8/22/2001, (#43) Lurker, austingirl, 19:34:14, 8/22/2001, (#44) (c) Lurker, JR, 19:45:00, 8/22/2001, (#45) I have a letter off to John vanTassel..., Dunvegan, 22:38:18, 8/22/2001, (#46) ................................................................... "IMUS mentions jameson..." Posted by LurkerXIV on 09:55:25 8/20/2001 ...and has an exchange with Peter Boyles: (credit to zapata for sending this in) On the "Imus in the Morning Show" this morning at about 5:20 a.m. central time. Imus mention's the story about the evidence that an internet poster sent to Mark Beckner. He jokingly said he thought that Peter Boyles had sent the (evidence) to Beckner to get the story going again. At about 5:20 or 5:21 a.m. Central Time Peter Boyles calls the show and tells Imus who Jameson is, even gives her real name on the air, LOL, and that she lived in the Carolinas. Imus asked Peter if he thought the case would ever be solved and Boyles told him it was solved that he believed Patsy killed JonBonet. Imus asked Peter why the Ramsey's did not sue him, and he said he did not know, but they had sued several people, among them Steve Thomas. I am hoping that one of you in a different time zone will get the show on MSNBC after I did and will be able to tape it, and maybe type up the transcript. Boyles calls Imus about 20 minutes after Imus' show starts. [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "email IMUS c/o John" Posted by LurkerXIV on 10:05:58 8/20/2001 John Sullivan Imus on MSNBC john.sullivan@msnbc.com I'm sure the I-Man would be interested in some of your comments. Although he often dismisses his email with: "What a bunch of @#$%^!!". [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "Geraldo..." Posted by shadow on 13:13:24 8/20/2001 About a week ago, Geraldo was doing his Condit/Levy thing (as usual) - he said, "like the JonBenet case, we may never know who killed Chandra." A retired FBI agent (woman) guest said, "We know who killed JonBenet." Geraldo said, "Yeah" and quickly changed the subject. Boyles may not be afriad of being sued by the Ramseys, but it appears that Lin Wood got Geraldo's attention! shadow [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Since Imus wants to know who jameson is..." Posted by LurkerXIV on 18:52:23 8/20/2001 ...I sent this page by Ruth G. to his email person, John Sullivan: http://www.geocities.com/Area51/nebula/9337/jameson.html [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "Lurker" Posted by austingirl on 19:14:36 8/20/2001 Nice work. After I was reminded by your first post about how I-man treats some of his emailers (and I've heard some zingers) I decided to take a pass. Maybe he'll get interested enough to lampoon her. That would be cool. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Lurker..." Posted by Show Me on 19:44:23 8/20/2001 way too cool! Imus needs to read this. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "(c) Lurker" Posted by JR on 19:31:04 8/20/2001 You bad! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "I'm so bad, I'm good!" Posted by LurkerXIV on 19:32:25 8/20/2001 Maybe I'll send it to FOXnews, too. Thank you, Ruthee, wherever you are! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Where's Cutter's Picture?" Posted by Sabrina on 20:53:50 8/20/2001 Someone please......send them Cutters collage of case clowns [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Ellique comments" Posted by Ellique on 08:23:27 8/21/2001 About 15 miles over into civilization there is a Burger King. In the mornings it is a popular gathering place for men who have reached their "Golden Years". They have their second cup, settle the National Debt, and proceed to engage in seeing who can tell the biggest lies. All of us guys are pretty knowledgable about the world in general and it is fun for me to chit chat with them whenever I get the chance. I am not there too often because I feel as if I have more important fish to fry. Why do I mention this? Well I have brought up the JonBenet murder and they all were knowledgeable about it but really didn't have concrete ideas as to the evidence or who was really responsible about it. As to Justice Watch and/or Jameson efforts, They were totally unknowing. Blank faces is all I got on mentioning both. Here at Justice watch, the prevailing mindset is that everybody in The United States has an idea who killed JohnBenet and that Justice Watch IS their paragon of truth and virture. Of course there are others who disagree, such as Jams and myself. Now along comes Imus. Low and behold, he has to be informed as to the identity of Susan Bennet and how she fits into the "Ramsey Mosaic" under her Internet name of Jameson "Jams". Imus is well known and should be on top of things but if he is ignorant along these lines, then think about all the rest of the people here in America who are even more unknowing. Let us all not get too carried away with self-aggrandizement. Justice Watch folks just may be the only ones who think that John and Patsy "gotta be de ones". Just my opinion folks. Be gentle with me, 'cause I still Love y'all Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "Hello" Posted by doScubie on 09:24:23 8/21/2001 John and Patsy are the ONES! Duh! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Scrutiny" Posted by Ayeka on 09:45:43 8/21/2001 If hir can't stand the heat, hir should have stayed out of the kitchen in the first place. Ayeka [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "Discovery mentions Ram-knots" Posted by Greenleaf on 09:40:30 8/21/2001 I didn't want to start a new thread, so I'm mentioning this little tid-bit here. I believe I saw this on the Discovery channel yesterday. Mr. ___Tassle, the knot expert, was being interviewed about his work in solving crimes. He mentioned the Ramsey case and said that he had testified before the Ram Grand Jury, but could not disclose anything about his testimony. Did we know that he testified before the GJ? This may be old news, but I don't remember hearing this before now. GL p.s. Maybe Imus will invite jams out to his ranch, and give her a mule to ride back to the mountain. Connie Chung will, no doubt, be so jealous. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "popular opinion, Ellique" Posted by austingirl on 15:47:54 8/21/2001 JR, our own dear JR, mentioned that she was asked by several people also dining at Baby Acapulco the evening of the Texas Do "who" we were (especially after the champagne presentation). No one expected them to know about Justice Watch, but they sure do know the name JonBenet Ramsey. And the consensus is "the parents are good for it". I have personally encountered this same sentiment while waiting in line at the grocery store where those awful tabloids are sold. Perhaps we should take an informal poll at our local shops and see what the reaction is. I'm afraid you and jams ( not to mention the Ramseys) will be terribly disappointed. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "my informal surveys" Posted by Bets on 16:45:53 8/21/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 16:45:53, 8/21/2001 For a few years I kept my Ramsey case obsession a rather guarded secret. But, then I started being more open and talking about it to people all over the country. I've asked friends and family in West Virginia, Arizona and California for their opinions. Bunco friends, fellow church members, neighbors, friends of friends....etc. Probably more than 50 people, all totaled. As God is my witness, of all the folks I've ever talked to only three (one being my mom) think an intruder killed JonBenet. Everyone else has mentioned one of the three other Ramseys (or a combination, thereof) who slept in that house on December 25, 1996 as the killer. Edited to thank Greenleaf for the information about the knot specialist testifying in front of the Grand Jury. Whether other people already knew or not, I've always wondered about that very issue. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Bets" Posted by Ellique on 17:00:45 8/21/2001 Poll taking 101. Never ever ask people in a social gathering what take they have on a situation such as who killed JonBenet. It has been proven over and over and over that if you ask them personally and especially in a social setting you are going to get opinions that AGREE WITH YOURS 80% of the time. THAT HAS BEEN PROVEN OVER AND OVER. Why is that so? The experts, a group which does not include Old Ellique, say it is simple. The questionee wants to be cordial and convivial and will not express themselves too honestly, that is to say, if they have a concrete opinion they will not give it to you because they don't know how you may feel about it andf it they know how you feel they will remain somewhat silent or agree with you whole heartedly. These are the facts Bet. Sorry to burst your bubble. Now, do I think most Americans think that the Ramseys know who did it or was involved themselves? No way of telling. To my knowledge no scientific poll has ever been undertaken. There it is Bes, right from the Professor's mouth. Love You. Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "Ellique" Posted by Bets on 17:16:16 8/21/2001 I believe you're presuming a bit too much. You would have to know me in real life, to understand my personality. First off, I have had many different opinions through the years of who committed the Ramsey murder. Secondly, I do not freely give out my own opinions on this case to even friends. I'll loan people the books I own, talk over what's been written and put out to the public, and sometimes venture some of my top scenarios of what might have happened - but I simply don't do pronouncements of "whodunit" since I honestly don't know. I clearly didn't try to say that my surveys are the absolute most scientific in the country. But to completely repudiate the opinions of scores of people, when you know nothing about me or how I operate, smacks of an awfully defensive position, on your part, Ellique. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "Thanks GL" Posted by Gemini on 17:19:44 8/21/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 17:19:44, 8/21/2001 We were talking about this on another thread a couple of weeks ago. Dun said, at that time, she would be contacting the knot expert to see if he was interested in saying anything about his GJ testimony. Have you heard anything back from him, Dun? Geez, I don't get the "parents dunnit" response at all. Of course I don't go around asking strangers : ). Of the few people I have mentioned it to ... a good 90% have responded with something like, "you know ... I haven't a clue ... what do you think"? Which, to me, means this is not a big interest of theirs. Among the other 10%, my older daughter used to think the parents were guilty, but somewhere along the line, changed her mind, my husband has long believed they are innocent, as has my next door neighbor (a psychologist, btw). One of my best friends and, also, my cousin, think they are guilty but couldn't say why. I don't mean this with any kind of air of self-importance, but, honestly, I don't know many extremely judgemental people. Most of my friends are the sort who would never condemn someone without proof. And, not one single RT person I know, well enough to KNOW one way or the other, reads the tabs. edited to clarify that last sentence because I'm sure SOMEBODY I know reads the tabs ... I just don't know them well enough to be aware of it. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "Bets I don't have to know you" Posted by Ellique on 17:59:43 8/21/2001 or know about what type of personality you have to make such pronoucements. As a matter of fact I wasn't even talking about you. I was only addressing my comments to you. Sorry Bets, you may be the most diplomatic envoy there ever was but unless you reread and UNDERSTAND my post about how such polls are not scientific you will never understand their worthlessness. Sorry bets, you may think you rate right up there with Roper and think you are "right on" but you ain't. It is not because I SAY you ain't, it is because the experts say you ain't. That is just the way it is. Sorry that I "busted" yo bubble. Those are the facts about poll taking whether you or I agree or not. Hey I didn't write the book !! I love you so why would you be be curt with Old Ellique anyhow anyway? Love, Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "I don't " Posted by Florida on 17:47:40 8/21/2001 know anyone personally who is as interested in this case as I am. However, just about everyone I've ever talked to think the parents are involved because of their behavior after the murder. The Ramsey's did themselves no favors by not working publically with the police after the murder. By the same token I haven't talked to anyone who isn't awed by the Levy's and their pursuit of finding the reason their daughter disappeared. Had the Ramseys not clammed up and hidden behind Haddon I think the attitude of the country might be a lot different. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Ellique" Posted by austingirl on 18:27:11 8/21/2001 You misunderstand. You were the one who brought up the JonBenet case in a social situation according to your initial post. You claim that your friends were "knowledgeable" about the case but didn't have any concrete ideas about the evidence or who was responsible for "it" ( do you mean the crime or handling the evidence? - I think you mean the crime). JR did not quiz the other diners about their view of who was guilty, rather they responded with, "Oh, the case where the parents killed the little girl". Unsolicited opinion. My own experience is that I will shake my head at the latest tawdry headline and ask someone waiting in line, "Can you believe that case still isn't solved?" Usually, the person will say something like the parents should have been in jail since day one and the cashier with agree. No one is claiming to be taking a scientific poll, no one is going around putting people on the spot so they feel they have to agree with you. Like it or not, the vast majority of the American public knows that the Ramsey's lack of cooperation with the police, the public relations assault on CNN mere days after their daughter's burial and their hiding behind lawyers as well as the fact that a child asleep at home on Christmas night is the least likely victim of a crime, coupled with a staged crime scene leads to one conclusion - they are guilty. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "81% says Rams are Guilty" Posted by LurkerXIV on 18:19:07 8/21/2001 http://www.vote.com/vResults/index.phtml?voteID=9554876&cat=4075633 This and every other poll at vote.com have a large percentage voting for Ramsey guilt. On this one, 81% of 24,416 people say that one of the parents was responsible for her tragic death. So much for Ellique's expertise. BWAHAHAHAHA! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "Lurker" Posted by austingirl on 18:34:40 8/21/2001 I think your post should be titled: Poll taking 201 [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "Greenleaf, this just in" Posted by austingirl on 18:33:33 8/21/2001 The knot expert's testimony.... It looks to me like somebody took an old paintbrush, broke it, tied some flat cord to it, wrapped it around a bunch of times. Looks like a couple of times they caught the cord underneath the wraps - that's about it. "A professional killing device"? chuckle, chuckle, chuckle No sir, not hardly. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "Ellique" Posted by driver on 19:20:19 8/21/2001 With all due respect, El - I don't think a bunch of old you-know-whats at a Burger King coffee clatch might necessarily be considered the most likely to have their fingers on the pulse of the JBR case. However, after seeing some of the on-the-street quizzing of some fellow citizens who do not even know the name of our President - and other equally appalling lack of basic awareness of current events, nothing would surprise me. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "Bets is right...." Posted by Sabrina on 19:48:36 8/21/2001 I asked a business client in England to watch the Crock II, I never ever discussed my beliefs with him, and he did not know anything about the case. Here is what he had to say after watching it: "I watched that show last night but it seemed so biased on the defence of the parents side.I think that the parents were involved in a paedophile ring and the little girl was beginning to talk about it!" I also have asked about 50 or more people what they thought-people from all walks of life and living all over the U.S.--including defense attornies! I never disclosed my views either, so there goes Ellique's hair brained theory that in social situations people will say whatever to agree with you. How could they agree if they don't know what you think. Of everyone I asked only one, my 80 year old neighbor thinks the Ramseys are innocent. When I asked her why she thinks that way, she said they seem too nice to kill their child. Everyone else told me the parents are involved. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "(c) Driver...Heh" Posted by JR on 19:45:07 8/21/2001 I don't even know what day it is most of the time. Even my mom made the statment at the oral surgeons today that I need to go back to work. ;-\ [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "Keep posting while I enjoy it." Posted by Ellique on 20:13:58 8/21/2001 Internet poll? Now that's a poll. The vast majority of Americans believe the parents dood it. Let see if my math is any good, OK? Let's be conservative and say that 75%(vast majority) of the people who live in the United States, excluding Canadians and Mexicans (they are Americans too you know even though Visitor Information people all over Europe don't know it) would figure out as about 200 million or so. Now exclude the people under age of say 16 and you come up with no less than l50 million who KNOW that the RAMS are guilty as sin The 200 census figures places our population at around 275 million, doesn't it? To the JW who came up with that statement I just have to say, I have a waterfall in the Great Smokies that is for sale. Love Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "I would love to know one person in " Posted by ayelean on 20:11:11 8/21/2001 Real Life who can discuss this case intelligently. I usually never mention that I am this interested in the case. On occasion it comes out, and before I even have a chance to voice my opinion, I get remarks similiar to this: "What in the world is there to discuss? The parent/s know what happened to her and they should be in jail." [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "Ellique" Posted by austingirl on 20:18:19 8/21/2001 We are talking about people's opinions here, lighten up, Francis! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 30. "Ellique" Posted by momo on 20:21:51 8/21/2001 Imus is no dummy because he doesn't know Jameson. I don't who would care to get to know her, do you? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 31. "Momo and Austin girl" Posted by Ellique on 20:56:26 8/21/2001 >Imus is no dummy because he doesn't >know Jameson. I don't who would >care to get to know her, >do you? Ellique's response. What does that supposed to mean? About? Biblical? Namewise? Personally? or what? To Austin Girl: Who is Francis? Love, Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 32. "(c) Ellique" Posted by JR on 22:42:13 8/21/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 22:42:13, 8/21/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 20:59:55, 8/21/2001 Hope you aren't looking for anything other than "all of the above" here. I gave you Caledonia. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 33. "(c) Class Act and Lawyers too" Posted by JR on 22:44:12 8/21/2001 HOW IGGNERENT AND UNEDUCATED Posted...guess where. No I don't believe it was intentional as there were like errors in the body of the post. Of interest perhaps: http://www.geocities.com/NapaValley/7719/attorneys.html [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 34. "Ellique" Posted by pinker on 03:30:06 8/22/2001 Could be the good ole boys from your Burger King exude that 'southern common sense' while the rest of the country operates cerebrally. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 35. "Imus right now" Posted by RiverRat on 04:25:31 8/22/2001 There was a comment, something like, give it a week and JonBenet will be back in the news. Maybe they read here, LOL! We have said the same thing for years. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 36. "Ellique" Posted by momo on 07:32:53 8/22/2001 Ha, ha. I'm pretty sure IMUS has no plans on knowing jameson in the biblical sense or otherwise. It's as if he's an idiot because he's never heard of her. LOL [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 37. "Ellique" Posted by Sabrina on 07:58:15 8/22/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 07:58:15, 8/22/2001 WHY are you excluding Mexicans and Canadians "that live in the United States?" Are they NOT people with opinions too? Edited to add: Many of the people I talked to for my "market research" about the Ramsey case just happen to be Mexicans "that live in the United States." And we have alot of Canadians posting here, they do have access to American TV and publications, you know. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 40. "Never ever exclude anyone" Posted by Ellique on 08:53:16 8/22/2001 No way do I exclude Canadians or Mexican who reside un the USA. My post wasn't too clear was it? Alas, so what else is new? Ha Ha. When I was posting I happened to think about a time when we were in Germany, France, Switzerland, or somewhere, and overheard a Visitor Information clerk ask a couple if they were "Americans" to which they responded, YES. They said they were from Mexico City, Mexico. Well it wasn't too important but that couple had a friendly but hard time trying to explain that they were not citizens of the USA but were AMERICANS nevertheless. Then it came my turn to try to make the clerk understand that AMERICANS are people from both North and South America and that Mexico just happened to be in North America but that Brazilians are also AMERICANS who are from South America. She never did GET IT, bless her pointed head and heart. I left with my brouchers(sp) as she was asking in very good but broken English, "Are you sure about that?" Love, Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 38. "Ellique" Posted by Jerrya on 08:29:22 8/22/2001 Let us all not get too carried away with self-aggrandizement. Justice Watch folks just may be the only ones who think that John and Patsy "gotta be de ones". You are not indeed not well informed my friend. Let's not get carried away with SELF-AGGRANDIZEMENT. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 39. "jerrya..." Posted by LurkerXIV on 08:52:52 8/22/2001 When nobody else will aggrandize you, you just gotta do it yourself! BTW, your post are way spiffy with those jazzy html effects. LOL! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 41. "If you only loved me half as much as I do." Posted by Ellique on 08:58:05 8/22/2001 If you got IT, flaunt IT, I say. Thanks Jerrya. Love, Ellique [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 42. "Ellique" Posted by austingirl on 18:52:06 8/22/2001 Sorry to answer you so late. Just got on the computer today. "Lighten up, Francis", is a quote from the movie "Stripes" with Bill Murray. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 43. "Oh, austingirl," Posted by LurkerXIV on 19:01:46 8/22/2001 I was thinking of Francis the Talking Mule, but maybe that was before your time. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 44. "Lurker" Posted by austingirl on 19:34:14 8/22/2001 ROTHFLMAOPIMP [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 45. "(c) Lurker" Posted by JR on 19:45:00 8/22/2001 AG had a birthday the day after the Texas Do and she thinks that qualifies her to be in my age group. ;-\ [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 46. "I have a letter off to John vanTassel..." Posted by Dunvegan on 22:38:18 8/22/2001 ...informing him of Darnay Hoffman's recent overturning of the Colorado GJ gag law. I'm hoping he'll take mercy on me as the wife of a nat'l born Canadian, and send me a short note. Keeping you posted. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] ARCHIVE REMOVE