Justice Watch "Thomas Wins!!!!!" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... Thomas Wins!!!!!, Watching you, 09:27:17, 9/07/2001 The case has, Watching you, 09:28:19, 9/07/2001, (#1) Yeehawwwww, Bobby, 09:29:52, 9/07/2001, (#2) The next sound, Watching you, 09:30:18, 9/07/2001, (#3) great news, austingirl, 09:33:47, 9/07/2001, (#4) Hallelujah!, LurkerXIV, 09:33:51, 9/07/2001, (#5) This is great, Florida, 09:34:34, 9/07/2001, (#6) Here's the funny part, Watching you, 09:34:50, 9/07/2001, (#7) Gee WY, Bobby, 09:37:23, 9/07/2001, (#8) YES!!, v_p, 09:43:39, 9/07/2001, (#11) yeehaaa, Tricia, 09:43:07, 9/07/2001, (#10) Well--, vic, 09:43:04, 9/07/2001, (#9) Famous last words from me, starry, 09:47:03, 9/07/2001, (#12) Winning?, 1000Sparks, 09:49:37, 9/07/2001, (#13) Thanks WY, RiverRat, 09:53:56, 9/07/2001, (#15) Look, Tricia, 09:51:42, 9/07/2001, (#14) Well...what did I tell you..., DAWN, 10:06:44, 9/07/2001, (#17) More news, Tricia, 10:06:10, 9/07/2001, (#16) It's still, Tricia, 10:17:44, 9/07/2001, (#18) Tricia, Thor, 10:22:24, 9/07/2001, (#19) Ex-Det Thomas', Ally, 10:26:36, 9/07/2001, (#20) Please, Tricia, 10:52:56, 9/07/2001, (#21) Well Tricia, Midnight_Wolf, 11:05:49, 9/07/2001, (#22) swampers, austingirl, 11:24:20, 9/07/2001, (#24) Tricia, Midnight_Wolf, 11:34:33, 9/07/2001, (#28) Midnight Wolf, Watching you, 11:18:41, 9/07/2001, (#23) I hope this is a sign , emerckx, 11:38:48, 9/07/2001, (#29) Hot d*mn!, Ayeka, 11:28:19, 9/07/2001, (#27) Makes me happy, Jerrya, 11:28:10, 9/07/2001, (#26) WY, Midnight_Wolf, 11:26:27, 9/07/2001, (#25) who is Mr. Barrett, fly, 11:50:20, 9/07/2001, (#32) Something's up with Jams, Watching you, 11:44:36, 9/07/2001, (#31) Great news and, kaw49, 11:43:29, 9/07/2001, (#30) Fly and y'all, Watching you, 11:57:11, 9/07/2001, (#34) Fly, RiverRat, 11:57:07, 9/07/2001, (#33) I guess I should be, Watching you, 11:58:54, 9/07/2001, (#35) CYA is all, fly, 12:12:17, 9/07/2001, (#37) WY, RiverRat, 12:10:51, 9/07/2001, (#36) Well....., Nedthan Johns, 12:24:50, 9/07/2001, (#39) Oh Watching You, Midnight_Wolf, 12:18:09, 9/07/2001, (#38) A technicality?, Ev, 12:52:02, 9/07/2001, (#40) WY, Seeker, 13:14:38, 9/07/2001, (#41) Thanks for the good info, Gemini, 14:32:41, 9/07/2001, (#42) I don't know about that Gem,, Florida, 14:55:51, 9/07/2001, (#44) Gem, v_p, 14:52:50, 9/07/2001, (#43) Not saying yes, Watching you, 15:05:52, 9/07/2001, (#45) WY, fly, 15:15:39, 9/07/2001, (#46) Hooray for Steve! Now what's, Show Me, 15:34:17, 9/07/2001, (#48) Right, Fly, Watching you, 15:25:45, 9/07/2001, (#47) Nedd, Jerrya, 15:40:53, 9/07/2001, (#50) Wasn't there something,, Gemini, 15:36:18, 9/07/2001, (#49) TV News, Bobby, 18:07:31, 9/07/2001, (#51) Gemini, fly, 18:31:53, 9/07/2001, (#52) First of all, v_p, 18:58:02, 9/07/2001, (#53) wouldn't, Tricia, 00:32:57, 9/08/2001, (#54) HaHaHaHaHaHaHa, Watching you, 08:39:20, 9/08/2001, (#55) Yes, Tricia, 08:54:24, 9/08/2001, (#56) Tricia, Watching you, 08:58:54, 9/08/2001, (#57) WY, Tricia, 09:14:51, 9/08/2001, (#58) ................................................................... "Thomas Wins!!!!!" Posted by Watching you on 09:27:17 9/07/2001 according to my nemesis at CS, the warrant has been quashed. Horray!!! [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "The case has" Posted by Watching you on 09:28:19 9/07/2001 been dismissed. Why don't you pick me up and smoke me sometime!!!! Yeeehawww!!! Pay up, Ellique. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "Yeehawwwww" Posted by Bobby on 09:29:52 9/07/2001 Finally some relief! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "The next sound" Posted by Watching you on 09:30:18 9/07/2001 you hear will be the sound of the swamp mistress imploding, hahahahhaahaha - watch out for falling debris.... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "great news" Posted by austingirl on 09:33:47 9/07/2001 I am so happy. A well-deserved win. Congratulations, Steve! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "Hallelujah!" Posted by LurkerXIV on 09:33:51 9/07/2001 I never once doubted Steve Thomas's honesty and integrity in this matter. Some folks will be eating humble pie today!!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "This is great" Posted by Florida on 09:34:34 9/07/2001 news, wonder what happened to the warrant server? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Here's the funny part" Posted by Watching you on 09:34:50 9/07/2001 counsel for Tom Miller moved to quash the bench warrant. Now, I wonder why Tom Miller's lawyer did that. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Gee WY" Posted by Bobby on 09:37:23 9/07/2001 No one has acknowledged the ST news post at the swamp. They are Talking about OJ . Weird as it gets over yonder. . . [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 11. "YES!!" Posted by v_p on 09:43:39 9/07/2001 Way to go Steve! This is a great sign. Victory #1, pay attention Rams... Are they celebrating in the swamp? Pay up Ellie [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "yeehaaa" Posted by Tricia on 09:43:07 9/07/2001 The fact the Miller's own attorney quashed the subpoena says to me he knew Thomas was telling the truth and the process server was LYING. Never a doubt in my mind. Hello Ellique:) Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "Well--" Posted by vic on 09:43:04 9/07/2001 It's still quiet at the swamp because hir head is spinning and spinning and spinning around. Hir needs a little time to make her comment sound "fair and unbiased." You know, like hir usually does :) It's nice to see honesty win. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 12. "Famous last words from me" Posted by starry on 09:47:03 9/07/2001 YIPPPPPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 13. "Winning?" Posted by 1000Sparks on 09:49:37 9/07/2001 Was there ever any doubt? GO STEVIE! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 15. "Thanks WY" Posted by RiverRat on 09:53:56 9/07/2001 Ya gotta admit that she does pull off some timely scoops. BTW, I had no doubt, Sparky. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 14. "Look" Posted by Tricia on 09:51:42 9/07/2001 I know it is a bit rude to gloat but, NED WHERE ARE YOU????? I have no doubt Ellique will pay up. I posted to her on the other Thomas thread. Major happy feet right now. Must go dance:) Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 17. "Well...what did I tell you..." Posted by DAWN on 10:06:44 9/07/2001 Congratulation Mr Thomas!! dawn [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 16. "More news" Posted by Tricia on 10:09:19 9/07/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 10:09:19, 9/07/2001 The county prosecuter is looking into charges against a Mr. Barrett for conspiring with Mr. Mahoney (the process server) to put Steve Thomas in jail. The judge gave Mr. Barrett many chances to tell the truth and recant and he refused. Mr. Mahoney apprantly recanted part of his testimony today as well. The Judge has figured out that this was a set up. more to come. Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 18. "It's still" Posted by Tricia on 10:17:44 9/07/2001 oh so quite at the swamp. Nothing from hir Perhaps she is taking a shower Perhaps she went to hir freezer to get hir dirty laundry and do some washing. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 19. "Tricia" Posted by Thor on 10:22:24 9/07/2001 LOLOLOL!!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 20. "Ex-Det Thomas'" Posted by Ally on 10:26:36 9/07/2001 truthfulness continues to be validated, over and over again. J F J B R ! ! ! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 21. "Please" Posted by Tricia on 10:52:56 9/07/2001 I truly hope those who accused Steve Thomas of lying will be big enough to apologize. STEVE THOMAS DID NOT LIE. STEVE THOMAS TOLD THE TRUTH. Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 22. "Well Tricia" Posted by Midnight_Wolf on 11:05:49 9/07/2001 Don't hold your breath. They are as nasty as ever over at the swamp. Nastier, in fact. deChef definitely has his little panties in a wad. Steve, I swear, you throw their little world upside down without even trying. Truth Hurts eh Swampers. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 24. "swampers" Posted by austingirl on 11:24:20 9/07/2001 The swampers are an illiterate, hateful bunch of poorly educated losers (notice the correct spelling, it's not "loosers"). The venom they have for Steve Thomas, a man of integrity who couldn't stomach the outrageous political machinations of the Boulder DA and wants justice for a murdered little girl, is truly breath-taking. The fact that they ignore the evidence and irrationally defend the real perps, while toadying up to an obsessed Ram-fan, is even more unbelievable. It will be a good long time before I can bring myself to stop by for another visit after reading their vomitous spew today. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 28. "Tricia" Posted by Midnight_Wolf on 11:34:33 9/07/2001 Now don't go denying yourself the simple little pleasures in life. Gloating when you are right. God knows they do. Well, I think they would, if they were ever right. And yes, it is quite the little venom pit over there today isn't it? Notice how the King(Queen) Cobra is nowhere in sight? I FIND THIS VERY INTERESING. You usually can't shut hir up. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 23. "Midnight Wolf" Posted by Watching you on 11:18:41 9/07/2001 Yep, truth sure does suck, doesn't it? Fact is, one of these days all those nasty little snipers who have been running off at the mouth about a whole bunch of things will be exposed. That's what happens when you lie and unjustly accuse people. It will come back to get you every time. Now what I want to know is, did someone put that process server up to setting Steve Thomas up? Who is behind all this? Something tells me the shit's about to hit the fan. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 29. "I hope this is a sign " Posted by emerckx on 11:38:48 9/07/2001 of things to come. Do you think it's possible that the tables are turning in favor of the truth in this case? Let's hope we get similar results from upcoming civil cases. Congratulations, Steve!!! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 27. "Hot d*mn!" Posted by Ayeka on 11:28:19 9/07/2001 Way to go, Steve! WY, check out the post above that says process server recanted. Chit, meet fan. Ayeka [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 26. "Makes me happy" Posted by Jerrya on 11:28:10 9/07/2001 Some folks will be eating humble pie today!!! and that makes me happy. Steve Thomas does not lie. Pay up sucker! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 25. "WY" Posted by Midnight_Wolf on 11:26:27 9/07/2001 Yep, and I'm just waiting for those blades to start turning. The beans are gonna spill one day. Maybe now is the time. I'm wondering where the swamps fearless leader is. Not a word from Jams today. Silence is golden isn't it? I guess she needs time to spin this newest development into a Ramsey positive. LOL. Waiting with baited breath. No Ellique, I didn't mean worms. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 32. "who is Mr. Barrett" Posted by fly on 11:50:20 9/07/2001 Who the heck is Mr. Barrett? And why did he want to create trouble for ST? That's what I'd like to know. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 31. "Something's up with Jams" Posted by Watching you on 11:44:36 9/07/2001 not that I give a hoot - that forum has been much better without her there with her smarmy comments and delete button. Rumor has it (yes, I said rumor) that someone turned Jams in for something to do with her AOL e-mail account, because it is no longer in service. She says she is doing family things, but if she is, it will be a first for her - she never gets far from her beloved forums. I don't know what's going on, but I have some sneaky suspicions that I'm not going to share, because I'm only speckalating. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 30. "Great news and" Posted by kaw49 on 11:43:29 9/07/2001 I had to wait until this afternoon to find out!! Go Steve! [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 34. "Fly and y'all" Posted by Watching you on 11:57:11 9/07/2001 Candy of CS gives this information: The three points recanted by process server Lawrence Mahoney on the witness stand today from his previous testimony were: 1) Talking to Steve Thomas through the storm glass door. 2) Seeing Steve Thomas's picture on the back of Steve's book and using that to identify him. 3) And, The point of contention between Lawrence Mahoney and Walter Barrett - that Lawrence Mahoney says now he did not sign the return of service in front of Walter Barrett. Supposedly, Walter Barrett says Lawrence Mahoney definately did sign the return of service in his presence. Lawrence Mahoney did not recant his previous testimony of going to the house to serve Steve Thomas, and he did not recant his testimony saying he ran after someone after he says someone ran for the house. Only the three points I listed above were recanted by Mahoney today on the witness stand. Mahoney cannot be prosecuted for what he recanted on the stand today. Today, the prosecutor in the Miller case, Mr. Hall, will meet with Dave Thomas, Jefferson County District Attorney, about whether or not to bring charges against either or both of the men. Steve Thomas can also file a civil lawsuit on his own. There is a belief that the quashing of the warrant for Steve Thomas will also, hopefully, lead to the quashing of the warrant against Fleet White. **************** [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 33. "Fly" Posted by RiverRat on 11:57:07 9/07/2001 Barrett is the Private Investigator that used the process server. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 35. "I guess I should be" Posted by Watching you on 11:58:54 9/07/2001 humble and say thank you to Candy. She did good getting this story out. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 37. "CYA is all" Posted by fly on 12:12:17 9/07/2001 Thanks for the who's who. Unless some new information reveals otherwise, sounds like this is probably just a routine case of CYA. Server didn't do his job appropriately, and tried as best he could to cover it up. No conspiracy to "get" ST. Just a conspiracy to avoid having to admit they blew the service. IMO. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 36. "WY" Posted by RiverRat on 12:10:51 9/07/2001 If you do, I pray that she never makes you regret it. Again. United We Stand DIVIDED WE FALL Obviously. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 39. "Well....." Posted by Nedthan Johns on 12:24:50 9/07/2001 Lawrence Mahoney did not recant his previous testimony of going to the house to serve Steve Thomas, and he did not recant his testimony saying he ran after someone after he says someone ran for the house. Only the three points I listed above were recanted by Mahoney today on the witness stand. Mahoney cannot be prosecuted for what he recanted on the stand today. Nedd: Sounds like to me this process server DID try to serve Thomas, but embellished in his story. I think the judge saw this and dismissed it. Thomas got lucky, that's all. This process server did not follow the right procedure. Thomas got off on a technicallity, that's all. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 38. "Oh Watching You" Posted by Midnight_Wolf on 12:18:09 9/07/2001 Sometimes humble is good. For you and your soul. There is nothing wrong with thanking the messenger, weather we like them or not. What is wrong is shooting the messenger because we don't like the message. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 40. "A technicality?" Posted by Ev on 12:52:02 9/07/2001 Hardy-har-har-har-har! In Steve's case from what I read here, he is now free to pursue his own damages, and I hope he will. Steve was dealing with the technical truth and not something made up and now look how it came out. Honesty still remains the "best policy." He could take the high road because he had nothing to hide, unlike the dregs on the bottom. Steve, continued support flows to you through this forum which is bent on seeking truth and justice. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 41. "WY" Posted by Seeker on 13:14:38 9/07/2001 You mean AFTER the real truth came out, not her previous "off for 12 weeks checking the facts" unlike us JW gossipy posters eh? The guys lied, the attorney knew and stopped representing them! He was working pro-bono if you'll recall. Candy basically said we were all idiots for speculating that the attny quit for just the very reasons that came out in court today (I firmly believe that's why he did quit). And just remember that "they" (her "sources") wouldn't talk to the media, but they'd talk to an internet poster so she could blab it to the world huh? Makes you go hmmmmmmm. If she said the sky was partly cloudy here, I'd have to go out and double check her "sources" for accuracey before believing anything she typed. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 42. "Thanks for the good info" Posted by Gemini on 14:32:41 9/07/2001 WY, and all (hat tip to Candy). I don't always agree with Thomas but thought he'd win this one. He'd have been a fool to let it continue this long unless he had something solid on his side. In this case, he knew he hadn't been served properly. I'm with Fly. Don't see a conspiracy here ... unless you count the possible deal between the process server and his "witness". This is probably the reason FW has seemed to want to continue his hearing until after the Thomas ruling. The attorneys may reach some kind of agreement to let him off the hook after this embarrassment. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 44. "I don't know about that Gem," Posted by Florida on 14:55:51 9/07/2001 Fleet White's case is very different than this one. He's never denied he was served, he just refused to show. He has the same responsibility as the rest of us to show up in court when summoned. He could then choose not to speak but he has to show up. I'm very disappointed that he did this and I don't think there is any reason for him to defy the court like he did. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 43. "Gem" Posted by v_p on 14:52:50 9/07/2001 >>He'd have been a fool to let it continue this long unless he had something solid on his side.<< Gem, precisely the way I feel about the civil case. ~*~*~*~*~*~ I suppose it's just a coincidence that Barrett worked for Haddon at one time. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 45. "Not saying yes" Posted by Watching you on 15:05:52 9/07/2001 not saying no. Ordinarily I would be right there with you, Gem and Fly on the conspiracy angle. There have been too many instances of unprofessional behavior in this case - most of it right in the DA's office, but I suspect most everyone knows where I stand on Hunter and his merry little band of bandits by now. Don't ever think that Hunter wouldn't have vengence on his mind with Steve Thomas. Not saying that's the way of it, just saying it's not really so far out there to say there could have been hanky panky going on behind the scenes. With that tribe, anything is possible. When you think about it, there are several with motives to try to frame Steve Thomas - the Ramseys, Jameson (yes, jameson, because she hates his guts), AlexfreakingHunter, DeMuth, Hofstrom... It's not as farfetched as one might think, really, especially in that corrupted piece of real estate. Sorry, I don't trust Boulderdom. I don't trust the Ramseys. And, there are a few more people I won't name here I don't trust, either. Hey, just saying.... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 46. "WY" Posted by fly on 15:15:39 9/07/2001 WY - That's why I said something like "evidence to the contrary"... However, I see the odds of some conspiracy to get ST sort of the same way I saw the claims that somebody planted the glove at OJ's house. At the time the glove had to have been planted, nobody knew if OJ would have an airtight alibi. Same thing for ST. You don't cook up a trap (and try to go through with it) if you aren't sure your guy is without an alibi. Tantalizing tidbit somewhere that the PI had worked for Haddon et al. No time specified in the post. Still, I'll stick with horses this time, rather than zebras. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 48. "Hooray for Steve! Now what's" Posted by Show Me on 15:34:17 9/07/2001 going to happen to the process server? Will Steve sue? Or just let it go? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 47. "Right, Fly" Posted by Watching you on 15:25:45 9/07/2001 and nobody planted that glove except OJ Simpson. It's probably NOT a conspiracy, well, I'll say it isn't a big conspiracy. I'm still not ruling out a conspiracy of two. Or three. Hey, I can't help it, Fly. If there wasn't a history of shenanigans in Boulder country, I wouldn't even be thinking like this. It's like, why lie about it? That's pretty serious stuff, really. And, have we got the whole story yet? I'm sort of leaning to no conspiracy but CYA like you said, but I'm not closing the book on this one yet. I think there may be more to this - how much, I don't know. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 50. "Nedd" Posted by Jerrya on 15:40:53 9/07/2001 Thomas got lucky, that's all. So did the Scamsey's. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 49. "Wasn't there something," Posted by Gemini on 15:36:18 9/07/2001 earlier on, about the DA office lawyer who was working the Miller case asking the judge to go easy on White? Or, am I mis-remembering? I, too, think FW should have acted responsibly and shown up ... but it won't surprise me if the attorneys strke a deal to let him off as easily as possible. Since process servers and PIs work for almost anybody and everybody ... I'd be more surprised if he'd never worked for Haddon's office. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 51. "TV News" Posted by Bobby on 18:07:31 9/07/2001 Just the same as we heard. http://www.kmgh.com/den/news/stories/news-94989520010907-110928.html [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 52. "Gemini" Posted by fly on 18:31:53 9/07/2001 Gemini - I agree about the PI. Nothing to get excited about. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 53. "First of all" Posted by v_p on 18:58:02 9/07/2001 I don't think anyone is "excited" about the PI, process server. And what Gem says is absolutely true... my daughter's daddy was a PI and worked for a lot of attorneys, and met a lot of the attorney's clients, and subsequently worked for them independently. A man is getting a divorce, he asks his attorney to hire an especially under-handed investigator to get the goods on his wife; even if he has to fudge a little. The investigator does his job so well the client asks him to do another job later on. This time he wants to set up a business associate who pist him off... get the goods. Walter probably did do some work for Haddon at some point, and made contacts in the process. I think the process server probably went to serve Thomas, but didn't try all that hard to get the job done. He's not lying about everything, just what's important. All JMO, of course. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 54. "wouldn't" Posted by Tricia on 00:32:57 9/08/2001 it be nice if somehow, someway we could follow the path of this process server right back to the Ramseys? Why was it so important for this guy to lie about not serving Steve? Why not just say " Sorry I'll keep trying". But no. The guy has to create this big production about a guy in overalls running into the house and blah blah blah. Sounds a bit over dramatic. Sounds like how Patsy would make up a story. OK I am really going to be now. Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 55. "HaHaHaHaHaHaHa" Posted by Watching you on 08:39:20 9/08/2001 Ha! Mrs. Brady's column is a hoot today. What a great day yesterday was, leading into a fantastic weekend, lalalalalala PERJURY... That's what it's all about. These two guys committed perjury. Lalalalalala Jameson made a Freudian slip? She or someone impersonating her posted a few days ago that she was in jail and the BORG can rest easy. Then she came back and said "not" in jail. Oh my, not why would she even bring jail up? Dear, dear, does this mean jail is a distinct possibility? Does it mean she is under investigation? Of course she is. Oh man, I tell you, what goes around, comes around. You lie, it catches up with you. Anyone telling lies and spinning stories about others needs to wise up. It will bite you in your arse every time. And, I won't feel sorry for you when it does. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 56. "Yes" Posted by Tricia on 08:54:24 9/08/2001 how right you are Watching You. That is what I live by: WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND. Both good and bad. Steve Thomas has held his ground because he has told the truth. He is standing strong against the Ramsey's and all their side shows. Steve's good Karma is coming back to him. Jammy on the other hand...hehehehe Ellique time to pay up my friend. Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 57. "Tricia" Posted by Watching you on 08:58:54 9/08/2001 credit where it's due, Ellique has graciously conceded on another thread, maybe the daily, can't remember, and has committed to sending $25 to two different charities. Now, does anyone care to wager on whether jameson is in hot water or not? Heh, thought not. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 58. "WY" Posted by Tricia on 09:14:51 9/08/2001 Just saw that and gave El full credit for being a very classy guy:) WY I don't think you are going to have any takers on the Jammy bet. :) Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] ARCHIVE REMOVE