Justice Watch "Jameson attacks Ruthee:" [ Main ] [ Post New Thread ] [ Help ] [ Search ] Table of Contents ................................................................... Jameson attacks Ruthee:, Jeanilou, 00:37:37, 9/22/2001 Jeanilou, Tricia, 00:58:29, 9/22/2001, (#1) Jeanilou, zapata, 13:13:03, 9/26/2001, (#2) Well, zapata, 13:51:41, 9/26/2001, (#3) I believe you could be right, Zapata, Mini, 15:55:16, 9/26/2001, (#4) Mini, zapata, 17:00:48, 9/26/2001, (#5) In Vogue, pinker, 17:20:20, 9/26/2001, (#6) Zapata and Pinker, Mini, 18:47:05, 9/26/2001, (#8) Wonder if, JR, 18:43:52, 9/26/2001, (#7) JR, zapata, 19:15:39, 9/26/2001, (#9) zapata, JR, pinker, 04:11:21, 9/27/2001, (#10) ................................................................... "Jameson attacks Ruthee:" Posted by Jeanilou on 00:37:37 9/22/2001 Couldn't sleep tonight so I got up to work on my personal webpages dealing with Jameson and was checking some links and came across this. It may not be new news but it was certainly new to me as I had not seen it before tonight: http://www.jameson245.com/ruthee_page.htm Jeanilou, the Internet Sleuth Opinion are just a dime a dozen and this is just one of mine. May you rot in hell Jameson! Take that and POST it on your website you lowlife scum! [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 1. "Jeanilou" Posted by Tricia on 00:58:29 9/22/2001 yes I have seen this vile attack on sweet Ruthee. Jeanilou I understand your anger at hir. I could go on and on about how disgusting she is and so on but remember Jammy's Karma will come back to her in a big way. It will happen. Jammy will be exposed for the evil, vile thing that she is. The more hir does things like attack a wonderful woman like Ruthee the bigger hir Karma train will be. I don't know how it will happen but it will. Jeanilou what goes around comes around. I promise you it will happen. Karma has yet to fail me. Jeanilou you are a fantastic poster. Keep it up. Keep the pressure on hir and the Ramseys. Karma. Good Karma comes around to those who do good like you Jeanilou.. Take care Tricia [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 2. "Jeanilou" Posted by zapata on 13:18:22 9/26/2001 NOTE: This message was last edited 13:18:22, 9/26/2001 Let's forget Jameson for the moment, but we will return to the Jameson act. I promise. Let's take a look at what the Rammer's say in the first crock vs what they write in "DOI". From the crock as aired on A & E. JR: JonBenet had gotten a bicycle that Christmas and we played most of the day. We were going to go out to dinner and I can remember we were trying to get everybody organized to leave and JonBenét was on her bike and wanted me to take her around the block. I said, "No - no we don't have time, we'll do that later." She said, "Oh Daddy, please," and I can remember that and that kind of hurts because we didn't do that. end................. From DOI: (all quotes from DOI are from the paperback edition): Page 5 4th paragraph: John: I watched the scene with a mild sense of amusement. Once the gifts are opened, dads tend to fade into the wallpaper while the rest of the family rushes through the day. (then John goes on to list all the things Patsy had to do that day and talks about the Charlevoix trip and the Big Red Disney boat trip) (I am sure he was trying to justify his trip to the airport for the reader.) Skip to page 6 paragraph 2: John: With everyone so busy, I decided to take the opportunity to scoot out to Jefferson County Airport (Jeffco, as local pilots had nicknamed it) to check out the airplane for out departure the next day. (Patsy reminded him to be back on time to go to the White's that evening.) end................. How different are these two versions? Remember this was taped in May of 98, but was not released here until August or September of 98. In the Crock version, John does not mention that he went to the airport that morning right after breakfast. We know he was late getting home from the airport because he did not have time to let JonBenet ride her bike around the block. I also believe I know how John is going to try to explain the 11:00 a.m. time he gave Stewart as the time he found JonBenet. He writes on page 6 & 7 that 11:00 a.m. is the time that they were to rendevous with Stewart, Melinda and JAR. He is going to say that he got the time mixed up and told Stewart that he found JonBenet at 11:00 a.m. and meant to say 1:00 p.m. That he was simply thinking of the rendevous time. edited for clarity. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 3. "Well" Posted by zapata on 13:51:41 9/26/2001 I guess you have to read every word the Ramsey's write to know what they are going to say in their depo. I bet they are so rehearsed. On page 7 last paragraph: John writes about the argument between Patsy and JonBenet. JonBenet not wanting to wear the red turtle neck to the White's. I believe the purpose of John writing that is to explain away why the red turtle neck sweater was balled up on JonBenet's bathroom sink. He is covering for Patsy's statement the morning of the 26th when she told police that she put JonBenet to bed in the red turtle neck sweater. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 4. "I believe you could be right, Zapata" Posted by Mini on 15:55:16 9/26/2001 My daughter found a copy of "DOI" for me at a bookstore for $4 and I can hardly wait to read it (even though I know how bad it is). I couldn't bring myself to buy it if the R's were going to profit. How do you think the red turtleneck and the red jumpsuit that Patsy stops to rinse out in the morning connect? [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 5. "Mini" Posted by zapata on 17:00:48 9/26/2001 I remember reading about the red jump suit in Schiller's book, but I need to go back and read it again. I am wondering if Patsy put JonBenet to bed in what she was to wear the next morning since Patsy writes in DOI that they often waited until they got ready to leave to wake the kids. Sometimes just put took them in what they had slept in. Boy, don't you know that would really make Patsy angry if JonBenet wet in the outfit she was to wear the next day? I truly do not know. I can't imagine a mother doing that, but after all, Patsy claims she did not take a shower that morning. I can't imagine doing that. Especially since Patsy writes that she wanted to make a good impression on Stewart. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 6. "In Vogue" Posted by pinker on 17:20:20 9/26/2001 Mini, maybe they were one in the same? I was always bothered by that red jump suit. Just what exactly is a jump suit? Overalls? A one piece coverall? A footed blanket sleeper? Could it have been an ordinary jumper as in a sleeveless dress worn with a shirt underneath as opposed to the English jumper which is a knit sweater? Or was it that strange leotard that snaps at the crotch, often in turtle neck variety? I did have a children's clothing store and that is not a common term for any garment, at least here in the midwest. I've seen Schiller on TV and he has the fashion sense of a paperweight but why did he call that a jump suit? Was that the word from police documents? More male interference... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 8. "Zapata and Pinker" Posted by Mini on 18:47:05 9/26/2001 I also thought that Patsy may have put the turtleneck on JB ready to wear the next morning. The only reason for JB still wearing the white shirt she'd worn to the Whites is that she was asleep and they didn't want to wake her. Well, we know from Burke that she was awake. I don't think the turtleneck and jumpsuit (I always thought of it being a 1-piece outfit that buttoned or zipped up or a shirt that snapped at the crotch) could be the same because the turtleneck was in JB's bathroom and Patsy said she rinsed the jumpsuit in the laundry sink outside JB's room. Both Schiller & ST mention it but don't give much detail. I'm afraid that evidence may not have been collected. It just seems ridiculous that Patsy would have taken the time that morning to rinse it out or check it for stains (I believe she gave 2 versions). For her to mention it in DOI, I think it must be important but I just can't connect the two [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 7. "Wonder if" Posted by JR on 18:43:52 9/26/2001 Jumpsuit equals a "onesie" type T-shirt which they do make for children. I always thought they were great. I bought several for my grandsons back in 95/96. which were mock turtlenecks - they snapped at the crotch insuring that they stayed tucked in. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 9. "JR" Posted by zapata on 19:15:39 9/26/2001 I don't know why but when I think of a jumpsuit, I think of a one piece garment sort of like overall's. The turtle neck could have been worn under it. I think I may have read the part about the jumpsuit wrong. I remember reading some where that the jump suit was the one JonBenet had worn when she sang at the mall? Does anyone have the page numbers in all three books handy? If so, would you post them. You have my curiosity up now. [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] 10. "zapata, JR" Posted by pinker on 04:11:21 9/27/2001 When she sang at the mall I thought she had on an elf type costume with a red turtleneck underneath. I think those underwear 'onsies' are only sold in infant sizes but I have seen snap at the crotch leotard turtlenecks in bigger sizes. It wouldn't be pratical for a child who should have independent potty skills or isn't that part of the problem... Could it be a minature coverall type garment as in aviation and jumping out of airplanes? Or something race car drivers/mechanics wear complete with patches. That is a common child's item. It sounds so masculine, maybe it was a hand me down from Burke. Could she have worn that over clothing on the evening of the 25th as 'protection' from hair bleaching chemicals? I wonder if the police were competent enough to inquire as to what type of stain needed attention. They must have that item in evidence and have analyzed the stain. I just read an Ann Rule story where police took an item that was being soaked complete in the bucket with water it was being soaked in. Pineapple? Crab? Candycane slobber? Hair chemicals? Vomit? Blood? Urine? Feces? Which would be the most telling stain Patsy would want to remove... [ REMOVE ] [ ALERT ] [ EDIT ] [ REPLY ] [ REPLY WITH QUOTE ] [ TOP ] [ MAIN ] ARCHIVE REMOVE